Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 – Sustainable Sand Mining Management Guidelines, 2016 – Enforcement and Monitoring Guidelines for Sand Mining, 2020 – Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 – Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2016 – The National Highway Authority of India awarded a contract to the project proponent for construction of a 4-lane bypass/ring road around Srinagar City – Four mineral blocks were reserved for the project proponent to excavate, develop and utilise the mineral – The project proponent applied for environment clearances (EC) for extraction of sand and gravel in the 3 blocks – J&K Expert Appraisal Committee (J&K EIAA) by its order dated 02.03.2022 granted the environmental clearance, however, it specifically recorded that the District Survey Report is not formulated as per guidelines and therefore it needs revision for including the replenishment data – Following, SEIAA granted EC to the project proponent on 19.04.2022 – Aggrieved by issuance of EC, respondnet no.1 filed appeal before the NGT – NGT allowed the appeal and held that the EC was granted despite the DSR not being prepared in line with the guidelines – Challenge to: Held: The purpose and objective of preparing such District Survey Report (DSR) is to scientifically locate the place for sand mining after calculation of annual rate of replenishment for allowing mining in the area – The replenishment report is an integral part of the DSR – In light of Guidelines, 2016 and the Guidelines, 2020, the absence of a replenishment study renders a DSR fundamentally defective – These guidelines categorically require that any assessment of mineable mineral quantity must be premised on scientific estimation of replenishment rates, failing which the DSR lacks the foundational data necessary to determine sustainable extraction limits – If the DSR becomes the foundation for consideration of an application for environmental clearance, then it is compelling to ensure replenishment studies are undertaken in advance and the report forms an integral part of the DSR – A District Survey Report without a proper replenishment study is untenable – On facts, J&K EIAA compromised with regulatory integrity by granting the environment clearances (EC) on the basis of a DSR without a replenishment report – The compromise sought to be achieved by permitting the project proponent to go ahead with a “restricted mining depth of maximum 1 meter and bulk density of 2.0 for production of the mineral and supplying it to maximum production of 34800 mt in view of non-availability of replenishment data” is unacceptable – Thus, the decision of the NGT is upheld. [Paras 1, 29, 32, 33, 37, 39]
Sustainable Sand Mining Management Guidelines, 2016 – Guiding principle:
Held: The 2016 guidelines are based on the principle that unregulated sand mining is unsustainable and must be controlled – Compliance with existing and future laws is mandatory rather than optional – Leaseholders should be allowed to self-regulate, provided they demonstrate adherence to legal requirements – However, if self-regulation proves ineffective, stricter enforcement and monitoring will be necessary, with penalties imposed in accordance with the law – Additionally, environmental protection and public well-being must be prioritized, ensuring that natural resources are utilized responsibly to contribute positively and sustainably to the economy – The prime objective of the said Guidelines is to ensure that sand mining is done in an environmentally sustainable and socially responsible manner. [Para 24]
Sustainable Sand Mining Management Guidelines, 2016 – Preparation of District Survey Report – Relevance and Scope: Held: As per the 2016 Guidelines, the preparation of DSR is essential for (i) identification of areas of aggradation/deposition where mining can be allowed, (ii) calculation of annual rate of replenishment, (iii) identifying ways of scientific and systematic mining, (iv) implementing safeguards in place to ensure the mining carried out is sustainable – The scope of the DSR should include detailed information for each district, covering rivers, streams, and other sand sources, along with the availability of sand, gravel, and aggregate resources – It must also provide data on existing mining leases for these materials – Additionally, the classification of mining areas should distinguish between sections of rivers, streams, and other sources that are suitable for sand and aggregate extraction and those where such activities are strictly prohibited – It is further provided that such survey document shall be prepared in the district based on direct and indirect benefits of mining and identification of the potential threats to the river/stream beds in the district. [Para 26]
As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Ankit Gyan. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.