LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/union-of-india-through-its-secretary-ors-vs-sgt-girish-kumar-and-ors-etc-20260212/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Union of India Through its Secretary & Ors. vs SGT Girish Kumar and Ors. Etc.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
12 February 2026
Case No.
Civil Appeal No(s). 6820-6824 of 2018
Bench
Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Citation
[2026] 2 S.C.R. 615 : 2026 INSC 149
Acts & Sections
Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 Pension Regulation for the Army, 2008 Limitation Act, 1963 Constitution
Supreme Court Reports [2026] 2 S.C.R. 615 : 2026 INSC 149
Issue for consideration
Issue arose for consideration whether the benefit of arrears of disability pension can be restricted to three years prior to filing of the original applications before the tribunal.
Headnote

Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 – Disability pension – Claim for arrears of disability pension – Benefit of arrears of disability pension, if can be restricted to three years prior to filing of the original applications before the tribunal:

Read the full headnote (1 more paragraph)

Held: Disability pension is grounded not merely in length of service, but in the impairment suffered by a member of the Armed Forces in the course of, or attributable to, the service rendered to the nation – Disability pension is not a matter of largesse, but a recognition of sacrifice made in service of the nation – Right to receive disability pension is a valuable right and once found due, the benefit of the same has to be given from the date it became due – It cannot be curtailed by restricting the benefit to a period of three years preceding the filing of the original application – In the absence of any compelling reason to take a different view, no justification to depart from the view consistently taken by this Court – Order dated 18.04.2016 granting the benefit of broad banding of the disability element to Armed Forces Personnel who had retired or were discharged on completion of engagement with disability, attributable to or aggravated by military service, from the date specified in the respective judicial orders, was a conscious policy determination taken with full financial concurrence – Thus, where the State itself, by a conscious policy decision, has determined that arrears of disability pension are payable from a specified cut off date, it is not open to it to subsequently resile and contend that such arrears ought to be confined to a period of three years preceding the claim – To permit such a course, would amount to acknowledging the right in principle while denying its substantive content in effect – Any such deprivation of accrued arrears which has become due to ex-servicemen in view of judicial determination as well as policy decision taken by the Union of India itself, would constitute deprivation of property and would amount to infraction of Art.300A of the Constitution – Union of India, as a model employer, is expected to act with fairness, consistency and even-handedness in the administration of benefits conferred upon those who have served the nation – When a benefit is recognised by a policy and affirmed by judicial pronouncement, its application cannot be selective or uneven – On facts, the original applications filed by the ex-servicemen does not suffer from any delay or laches disentitling them from claiming the relief of arrears of disability pension, thus, the objections on the delay and limitation without any merit – Orders passed by the tribunal in so far as they restrict the benefit of arrears of disability pension to three years preceding the filing of original application quashed and set aside – Appellants entitled to disability pension including the benefit of broad banding, due to them, with effect from 01.01.1996 or 01.01.2006, as the case may be, along with interest @6% pa. [Paras 15-23]

Keywords: Disability pension · Arrears of disability pension · Benefit of arrears of disability pension

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Alok Aradhe, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals, filed both by the Union of India and by Ex-servicemen, under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (‘Act’), arise out of conflicting decisions of the Armed Forces Tribunal (‘Tribunal’) concerning the period for which arrears of disability pension are payable. The Tribunal in certain cases directed payment of arrears of disability pension from specified cut-off dates, whereas, in others, restricted such benefits to 3 years prior to filing of the applications before the Tribunal. The present batch of appeals require this
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →