LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/umc-technologies-private-ltd-vs-food-corporation-of-india-anr-20210202/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Umc Technologies Private Ltd. vs Food Corporation of India & Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
2 February 2021
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 3687 of 2020
Result
Allowed
Bench
S. Abdul Nazeer, Sanjiv Khanna
Citation
[2021] 4 S.C.R. 396 : 2021 INSC 54
Supreme Court Reports [2021] 4 S.C.R. 396 : 2021 INSC 54
Headnote

Judgment/Order – Typographical error in the judgment – Correction of – The words “including an employee of the appellant” stand deleted from paragraph 4 of the judgment in UMC Technologies Private Limited versus Food Corporation of India & Anr. Civil Appeal No. 3687 of 2020, dated 16.11.2020 reported in [2020] 13 SCR 1175 – Rest of the order remain as it is – Application allowed.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

[2021] UMC TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LTD. v. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR. M.A. No. 175/2021 In (Civil Appeal No. 3687 of 2020) FEBRUARY 02, 2021 [S. ABDUL NAZEER AND SANJIV KHANNA, JJ.] Judgment/Order – Typographical error in the judgment – Correction of – The words “including an employee of the appellant” stand deleted from paragraph 4 of the judgment in UMC Technologies Private Limited versus Food Corporation of India & Anr. Civil Appeal No. 3687 of 2020, dated 16.11.2020 reported in [2020] 13 SCR 1175 – Rest of the order remain as it is – Application allowed. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISD
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →