LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-gopu-anr-20250408/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Gopu & Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
8 April 2025
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 5300 of 2025
Result
Allowed
Bench
Sudhanshu Dhulia, K. Vinod Chandran
Citation
[2025] 5 S.C.R. 169 : 2025 INSC 511
Acts & Sections
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Limitation Act, 1963 Limitation Act of 1871 Limitation Act of 1908 Limitation Act (XV of 1877)
Supreme Court Reports [2025] 5 S.C.R. 169 : 2025 INSC 511
Issue for consideration
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court enhancing the compensation awarded to the claimants under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Headnote

Limitation Act, 1963 – ss.5, 6 – Legal Disability – Death of wife in motor vehicle accident – Claim petition by the husband and two minor children – Tribunal awarded compensation – Thereagainst, after 10 years, children alone preferred appeal before High Court, wherein one child had attained majority five years back – High Court enhanced compensation – Correctness: Held: Appeal filed before the High Court was grossly delayed and hence not maintainable – s.6 enables a person disabled, by reason of minority, etc., to institute a suit or make an application for the execution of a ‘decree’, within the period of limitation provided, after the disability has ceased – Provision applies only with respect to a suit or an application for the execution of a decree and not in an appeal or any other proceeding – Impliedly, the exemption by reason of a disability applies to the institution of an original proceeding or an application for execution of a final decree, which will not apply in the case of an appeal – Father as the natural guardian has instituted the original proceeding before the tribunal, with both the minor children in the party array of claimants, represented by the father, the natural guardian – Father who is the natural guardian took a conscious decision not to file an appeal and was satisfied with the award – Intention of the legislature being very clear, it is not for the courts to extend the period of limitation on misplaced sympathies – Even s.5 has no application in the facts of the case, insofar as the long delay occasioned, especially when in the original proceedings, the children were represented by the father, the natural guardian – Judgment of the Single Judge of the High Court set aside – Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – s.166. [Paras 9, 12, 13]

Keywords: Compensation · Motor Accident · Claim petition · Enhancement of claim · Limitation to file appeal · Natural guardian · Exemption by reason of a disability · Delay · Natural guardian · Intention of the legislature

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Order Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against an order dated 01.03.2019, passed by the High Court of Kerala in MACA No.627 of 2016, by which the compensation awarded to the claimants by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Alappuzha (for short, `the Tribunal’) was enhanced. 3. On 02.06.2000 at 3.00 P.M., the deceased was riding pillion on a motorcycle being driven by one V.G. Shibu, 1st respondent before the Tribunal. Near the Avalookunnu Post office, respondent No.1 applied sudden brake to save a cyclist and the deceased fell and was injured. Ultimately, the deceased succumbed to
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →