Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – s.11 – Penal Code, 1860 – ss.420, 409 – PDS scam in the State of Bihar; misappropriation of more than a thousand crores by the accused rice-millers, 600 FIRs filed – High Court allowed s.11 petitions filed by the respondents-rice-millers and appointed arbitrators in several cases – As regards the objection of non-arbitrability of dispute due to allegations of criminality, High Court held that the allegations are simple accusations as against serious allegation of forgery or fabrication and as such there is no bar – Challenge to – Whether the dispute between the respondents and the appellant-Corporation arising out of the agreement incorporating the arbitration clause became non-arbitrable in view of the initiation and pendency of the criminal cases:
Held: No – Mere fact that criminal proceedings can or have been instituted in respect of the same incident(s) would not per se lead to the conclusion that the dispute which is otherwise arbitrable ceases to be so – There is a distinction between “serious fraud” and “fraud simpliciter” to segregate and exclude disputes involving serious fraud from arbitrability – Furthermore, Courts exercising jurisdictions u/s.11(6) and s.8 must follow the mandate of sub-section (6A) to s.11 and their scrutiny must be “confine(d) to the examination of the existence of the arbitration agreement” – In the present case, there is an arbitration agreement – All the issues raised by the appellant are kept open for being raised and contested before the arbitral tribunal – Appeals dismissed – Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914. [Paras 21, 27-30]
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – s.11(6), 8, 11 (6A) – Application u/s.11(6), if opposed on grounds of serious fraud – Enquiry by referral court – Scope:
Held: Courts exercising jurisdictions u/s.11(6) and s.8 must follow the mandate of sub-section (6A) to s.11 and their scrutiny must be “confine(d) to the examination of the existence of the arbitration agreement”. [Para 27]
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – s.11 – Arbitrability in cases of serious fraud – Principles governing, stated. [Para 21]
As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Divya Pandey 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1754 (2025) 1 SCC 502 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1098. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.