LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/the-institute-of-chartered-accountants-of-india-ors-vs-shaji-poulose-ors-20201209/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India & Ors. vs Shaji Poulose & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
9 December 2020
Case No.
Transfer Petition (Civil) Nos. 2849-2859/2019
Result
Allowed
Bench
Ashok Bhushan, M.R. Shah, R. Subhash Reddy
Citation
[2020] 9 S.C.R. 851 : 2020 INSC 691
Supreme Court Reports [2020] 9 S.C.R. 851 : 2020 INSC 691
Headnote

Transfer Petition – Constitution of India – Art. 139-A(1) – Supreme Court Rules, 2013 – Or. XL, Rule 1 – In the writ petitions, which are sought to be transferred, writ petitioners have challenged validity of chapter-VI of guidelines No. 1-CA(7)/02/2008 dated 08.08.2008 issued by the Council of petitioner Institute on the ground that the same is violative of Art. 19(1)(g) of the Constitution – The said chapter VI of the guidelines dated 08.08.2008 stipulates that a member of the Institute in practice shall not accept, in a financial year, more than “specified number of tax audit assignments”, which is at present 60 u/s. 44 AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – Several writ petitions regarding the same were pending in the Kerala High Court, Madras High Court and Calcutta High Court – The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India being the regulatory body for the profession of Chartered Accountants has filed the present transfer petitions for transfer of all the aforesaid writ petitions to the Supreme Court for final and conclusive determination of the issues involved – Held: The guidelines which are impugned in the High Court and the consequent disciplinary proceedings initiated against various Chartered Accountants throughout the country is an issue of public importance affecting Chartered Accountants as well as the citizens who have to obtain compulsory tax audits – To settle the law and to clear the uncertainity among tax professionals and citizens, it is appropriate that the Supreme Court may transfer the writ petition, to authoritatively pronounce the law on the subject – However, the interim orders operating in different writ petitions which are sought to be transferred should be allowed to be continued till the Supreme Court considers the matter and passes any other order – In result, Transfer Petitions are allowed.

Petrochemical Industries Corporation Limited and Another (2007) 15 SCC 649 – referred to.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ASHOK BHUSHAN, J. 1. These transfer petitions have been filed by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India under Article 139-A(1) of the Constitution of India read with Order XL Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 for transfer of several writ petitions pending in the Kerala High Court, Madras High Court and Calcutta High Court. 2. Notices were issued in the transfer petitions. A counter affidavit has also been filed by one of the respondents, i.e., respondent No.1. 3. We have heard Shri Arvind Datar, learned senior counsel for the petiti
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →