LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/tata-motors-limited-vs-central-sales-tax-appellate-authority-others-20220921/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Tata Motors Limited vs Central Sales Tax Appellate Authority & Others

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
21 September 2022
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 6450 of 2012
Result
Disposed
Bench
M.R. Shah, Krishna Murari
Citation
[2022] 4 S.C.R. 870 : 2022 INSC 992
Supreme Court Reports [2022] 4 S.C.R. 870 : 2022 INSC 992
Headnote

Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 – s.22(1B) – Finance Act, 2010 – Sales effected through RSO, Vijayawada w.r.t vehicles/buses sold to APSRTC were in the nature of inter-state sale – Appellant was thus liable to pay central sales tax to the State of Jharkhand however, treating the sale as stock transfer, it paid the tax on the aforesaid transaction to the State of Andhra Pradesh which is not leviable by it – Central Sales Tax Appellate Authority though found the transaction to be in the nature of inter-state sale but, passed no further consequential order directing to adjust the amount of tax paid on aforesaid transaction against the tax to be paid to the State of Jharkhand – On appeal, held: By the 2010 Act, s.22(1B) was inserted to the 1956 Act – Prior to the said insertion of s.22(1B), there was no provision by which the Appellate Authority could have issued directions for refund of the tax collected by the State which has been held by it to be not due to that State, or direct that State to transfer the refundable amount to the State to which central sales tax is due on the same transaction – In the present case, the transaction is for the period prior to insertion of s.22(1B) to the 1956 Act and the impugned order has been passed by the Appellate Authority pre-insertion of s.22(1B) to the 1956 Act – Thus, it cannot be said that it committed any error in not issuing any direction which now is permissible u/s.22(1B) of the 1956 Act – However, the State of Andhra Pradesh cannot retain the amount of central sales tax paid by the appellant on the transaction – Therefore, in line with s.22(1B), the State of Andhra Pradesh to transfer to the State of Jharkhand the amount of central sales tax deposited by the appellant w.r.t the transaction in question, subject to the appellant submitting the proof of the amount of central sales tax already paid thereon – State of Jharkhand to adjust the same towards the central sales tax liability of the appellant on such transaction.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order dated 29.06.2009 passed by the Central Sales Tax Appellate Authority, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Appellate Authority’) in Appeal No. 330/CST/2008, by which, though the transaction/sales of buses effected through RSO, Vijayawada sold to Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (for short, ‘APSRTC’) were found to be in the nature of inter-state, no further consequential order has been passed by the Appellate Authority directing to adjust the amount of t
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →