LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/tarun-dhameja-vs-sunil-dhameja-anr-20241206/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Tarun Dhameja vs Sunil Dhameja & Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
6 December 2024
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 14005 of 2024
Result
Allowed
Bench
Sanjiv Khanna, Sanjay Kumar
Citation
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 987 : 2024 INSC 973
Acts & Sections
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 12 S.C.R. 987 : 2024 INSC 973
Issue for consideration
Whether the arbitration clause between the parties is non-existent or requires agreement of all the parties to the dispute to refer the dispute to arbitration?

Interpretation and construction of arbitration clause discussed.
Headnote

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Arbitration clause in a partnership deed invoked by Appellant who is the legal representative of a deceased partner – Arbitration clause reads as: “That if at any time either during the continuance of the partnership or after the retirement of any partner, any dispute or difference shall arise between the partners or their respective heirs or any one claiming through or under them, the same shall be referred to arbitration. Arbitration shall be optional & the arbitrator will be appointed by partners with their mutual consent. In any case of dispute arise then the Jurisdiction of Indore Civil Court shall be applicable & acceptable by the partners” – Appellant filed a petition U/s.11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 that was dismissed by the impugned order.

Held: Cannot be said that arbitration clause is optional in the sense that the arbitration clause is non-existent or that the matter would be referred to arbitration only if all the parties to the dispute agree – First portion of the arbitration clause is clear – Legal representatives or anyone claiming through a partner is entitled to invoke the arbitration clause – Reliance placed on second portion not to be read in isolation but in context of earlier portion of the arbitration clause – The arbitration clause can be invoked by an aggrieved party who wants to take recourse to arbitration and mutual agreement exists to this extent – Absence of mutual consent by parties to appoint arbitrator does not obliterate or write off the arbitration clause – In terms of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 where parties cannot agree upon a common name as to who will act as an arbitrator, the court can appoint the arbitral tribunal. Reliance placed on Vidya Drolia v. Durga Trading Corpn. which in turn refers to the judgments in Fili Shipping Co. Ltd. v. Premium Nafta Products Ltd. and Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Narbheram Power & Steel (P) Ltd. on the issue of interpretation and construction of an arbitration clause – Arbitration clauses to be read in a pragmatic manner.

Keywords: Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Interpretation of arbitration clause · Pragmatic construction · Existence of arbitration clause · Mutual consent · Appointment of arbitrator · Appointment of arbitral tribunal

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Aandrita Deb, Hony. Associate Editor (Verified by: Shadan Farasat, Sr. Adv.) For short, “the A&C Act.” (2000) 4 SCC 272 [2007] 5 SCR 720 : (2007) 5 SCC 719. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Order Leave granted. In the present case, the arbitration clause in the Deed of Partnership dated 16.07.2016 reads as under:“23. Arbitration That if at any time either during the continuance of the partnership or after the retirement of any partner, any dispute or difference shall arise between the partners or their respective heirs or any one claiming through or under them, the same shall be referred to arbitration. Arbitration shall be optional & the arbitrator will be appointed by partners with their mutual consent. In any case of dispute arise then the Jurisdiction of Indore Civil Court
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →