LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/t-d-vivek-kumar-anr-vs-ranbir-chaudhary-20230428/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

T. D. Vivek Kumar & Anr. vs Ranbir Chaudhary

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
28 April 2023
Case No.
Civil Appeal Nos. 2514-2516 of 2023
Result
Disposed
Bench
M.R. Shah, C.T. Ravikumar
Citation
[2023] 4 S.C.R. 540 : 2023 INSC 462
Supreme Court Reports [2023] 4 S.C.R. 540 : 2023 INSC 462
Headnote

Specific Relief – Denial of – Appellants (original defendants), entered into a “sale agreement” with the respondent (original plaintiff) for the sale of a plot of land – A total amount of Rs. 2 lakh was paid as earnest money by the respondent – Respondent filed a civil suit seeking specific performance of the sale agreement and consequential relief of injunction – The suit was resisted by the appellants on the ground that as per the agreement to sell and on failure of the appellants to execute the sale deed, the respondent shall be entitled to double the amount given as an advance – The trial court refused to pass a decree for specific performance of the sale agreement but decreed the suit for recovery of Rs. 4 lakhs, i.e., double of the earnest money – First Appellate Court dismissed the appeal – High Court in second appeal granted the relief of specific performance – On appeal, held: As per clause 2 of the sale agreement, on failure on the part of the seller to execute the sale deed within the stipulated time, the purchaser/buyer shall be entitled to the double of the amount given as an advance – Plaintiff is bound by the terms and conditions stipulated in the sale agreement – Appeal allowed – Judgment of High Court in second appeal set aside – Judgment of trial Court affirmed by the First Appellate Court restored.

P. D’Souza v. Shondrilo Naidu (2004) 6 SCC 649 : [2004] 3 Suppl. SCR 186; M. L. Devender Singh v. Syed Khaja (1973) 2 SCC 515 : [1974] 1 SCR 312 – referred to.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Review Application No. 149-C/2016 in RSA No. 596/2012 and XOBJC -10C/2010, the original defendants have preferred the present appeals. 2. The facts leading to the present appeals are as under: 2.1 That a “sale agreement” was entered into between appellant No. 1 as attorney of appellant No. 2 (original defendants) and the respondent herein (original plaintiff) for sale of the suit plot in question
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →