Judgment – Modification of – Applicant sought modification of the judgment and order of the Supreme Court dated 31.08.2021 – Earlier, the Division Bench of the High Court had directed the demolition of Towers 16 and 17 by NOIDA constructed by the applicant – The Judgment of the High Court was affirmed by the Supreme Court – Applicant submitted that since the minimum distance required under the relevant Building Regulations was not complied with and there was violation of the requirement of maintaining a green area under the relevant Building Regulations – The applicant would meet the above two findings by slicing a portion of Tower 17, while retaining Tower 16 so as to ensure compliance of the above two findings – Held: The attempt in the present miscellaneous application was to seek a substantive modification of the Judgment of the Supreme Court – Such an attempt is not permissible in a miscellaneous application – Application u/Or.LV, Rule 6 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 cannot be inverted to bypass the provisions of review in Or.XLVII in the Rules 2013 – The miscellaneous application is an abuse of the process – A judicial pronouncement cannot be subject to modification once the judgment has been pronounced, by filing miscellaneous application – Thus, the miscellaneous application is accordingly dismissed.
Delhi Administration vs Gurdip Singh Uban and Others (2000) 7 SCC 296 : [2000] 2 Suppl. SCR 496; Ram Chandra Singh vs Savitri Devi and Others (2004) 12 SCC 713 : [2004] 12 SCR 713 – relied on.
Welfare Association and Other (2021) SCC Online SC 648; Vijay Kurle and Others (2020) SCC Online SC 711; Meghmala vs G Narasimha Reddy (2010) 8 SCC
383 : [2010] 10 SCR 47; Parbhani Transport Cooperative Society Ltd. vs The Regional Transport Authority, Aurangabad & Others AIR (1960) SC 801 : [1960] SCR 177 - referred to.
Nazir Ahmed vs King Emperor (1936) L.R. 63 IndAp
372 – referred to.
As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.