LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/sudesh-chhikara-vs-ramti-devi-anr-20221206/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Sudesh Chhikara vs Ramti Devi & Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
6 December 2022
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 174 of 2021
Result
Allowed
Bench
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Abhay S. Oka
Citation
[2022] 17 S.C.R. 876 : 2022 INSC 1257
Supreme Court Reports [2022] 17 S.C.R. 876 : 2022 INSC 1257
Headnote

Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007:s. 23 – Transfer of property to be void in certain circumstances – Applicability of s. 23(1) – When – Held: Effecting transfer subject to a condition of providing the basic amenities and basic physical needs to the transferor-senior citizen is sine qua non for applicability of sub-section (1) of s. 23 – When transferee refuses or fails to provide such amenities and physical needs to the transferor, the transfer shall be deemed to have been made by fraud or coercion or undue influence, and becomes voidable at the instance of the transferor and the Maintenance Tribunal – Very often, senior citizen executes a gift or a release or otherwise in favour of his or her near and dear ones, out of love and affection without any expectation in return, a condition of looking after the senior citizen is not necessarily attached to it – Thus, when it is alleged that the conditions mentioned in s. 23(1) are attached to a transfer, existence of such conditions must be established before the tribunal – Perusal of the petition u/s. 23 filed by respondent no.1-senior citizen shows that it was not even pleaded by respondent no.1 that the release deed was executed subject to a condition that the transferees-daughters of senior citizen would provide the basic amenities and basic physical needs to the senior citizen – No such finding was recorded by the tribunal – It was merely pleaded that the daughter had no intention to take care of her mother – Thus, the order of the tribunal and the High Court cannot be sustained and, set aside.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY S. OKA, J. FACTUAL DETAILS 1. This appeal arises out of a petition filed by respondent no.1 under Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (for short, ‘the 2007 Act’). 2. Respondent no.1 acquired a land bearing Khewat no.87, Khatoni no.124, Khasra no.315 measuring 1 bigha 18 biswa. She also acquired a land bearing Khewat No.247, Khasra No.269 (4 bighas 0 biswa) totally measuring 5 bighas and 3 biswa in Village Basai, Tehsil and District Gurugram, Haryana. She claimed that the acquisition was by way o
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →