LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/subodh-singh-vs-union-of-india-and-others-20240516/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Subodh Singh vs Union of India and Others

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
16 May 2024
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 6458 of 2024
Result
Allowed
Bench
Hima Kohli, Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Citation
[2024] 6 S.C.R. 708 : 2024 INSC 458
Acts & Sections
Indian Railways Act, 1989
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 6 S.C.R. 708 : 2024 INSC 458
Issue for consideration
Whether the appellant is entitled to additional compensation for the left out portion of land at least @ 5% of the value of the award for a period spreading over 84 months.
Headnote

Compensation – Additional compensation for the left out portion of land – Payment towards the delay only to two months – Appellant claimed payments towards delay of 84 months – Correctness:

Held: Respondents had acquired a land by Notifications issued u/s. 20(E)(1) of the Indian Railways Act, 1989 – An award was declared on 08.02.2010 in respect of land that respondent acquired – A parcel of land admeasuring 0.0624 Hectare was left out – The High Court vide order dated 20.09.2016 directed the respondents to provide compensation to the appellant for 0.0624 Hectare of land, which was left out, along with additional compensation – While calculating the additional compensation, respondent confined the same to a period of two months for delayed period – Appellant claimed that he was entitled to compensation for a period of 84 months and relied on one Kamla Devi & Ors. – This Court noted that an order dated 18.09.2017, passed by the Competent Authority refers to an order dated 19.07.2017, passed by the High Court in a Writ Petition filed by Kamla Devi and others and goes on to record that after completion of formalities of publication, some portion of the land admeasuring 0.0890 Hectare had been left out, as the same was not required for the subject project – Subsequently, another award was declared in respect of the left out area and additional compensation was paid to the land owners @ 5% per month of the award for a period of 66 months, i.e. from 19.04.2012 to 12.09.2017 – In light of the above, the appellant herein cannot be treated differently in his case, the respondents ought not to have confined the delayed payment on the awarded amount for the left out portion of land to only two months – Thus, the appellant is held entitled to additional compensation for the left out portion of land at least @ 5% of the value of the award for a period spreading over 84 months. [Paras 3, 4, 9, 12]

Keywords: Compensation · Additional compensation · Award · Delay in payment · Payment of additional compensation · Additional compensation for left out portion of land

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Order 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 31st August, 2017, passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad whereby, the Writ Petition filed by the appellant herein praying inter alia for issuing directions to the respondents to pay additional compensation for the entire land area, subject matter of the Notification dated 12th December, 2008, issued under Section 20(E)(1) of the Indian Railways Act1, 1989, at the rate higher than 5% per month and further pay interest @ 18% per annum for delay in payment from 30th March, 2011,
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →