LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/state-of-tamil-nadu-represented-by-the-secretary-to-government-public-works-department-vs-siddaramai-20180216/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Secretary to Government Public Works Department vs Siddaramaiah, Chief Minister, Government of Karnakata & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
16 February 2018
Case No.
CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 225/2013
Result
Disposed
Bench
Dipak Misra, Amitava Roy
Citation
[2018] 5 S.C.R. 1125 : 2018 INSC 154
Supreme Court Reports [2018] 5 S.C.R. 1125 : 2018 INSC 154
Headnote

Inter-State Water Disputes:

Water dispute between States of Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Kerala and Union Territory of Puducherry – In respect of waters of river Cauvery – Disposed of by Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 2456 of 2007 – Contempt Petition by State of Tamil Nadu against the Chief Minister of Karnataka and others – Held: Contempt petition closed in view of judgment passed in Civil Appeal No. 2456 of 2007.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY5ITS CHIEF [2018] S.C.R. 1125SECRETARY v. STATE 1125 OF T. N. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY [DIPAK MISRA, CJI] STATE OF TAMIL NADU REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT v. SIDDARAMAIAH, CHIEF MINISTER, GOVERNMENT OF KARNAKATA & ORS. (Contempt Petition (Civil) No. 225 of 2013 In Civil Appeal No.2456 of 2007) FEBRUARY 16, 2018 [DIPAK MISRA CJI, AMITAVA ROY AND A. M. KHANWILKAR, JJ.] Inter-State Water Disputes: Water dispute between States of Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Kerala and Union Territory of Puducherry – In respect of waters of ri
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →