LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/state-of-madhya-pradesh-and-anr-vs-m-s-keti-construction-20180418/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr. vs M/s. Keti Construction

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
18 April 2018
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 4016 of 2018
Result
Disposed
Bench
Adarsh Kumar Goel, R.F. Nariman
Citation
[2018] 3 S.C.R. 663 : 2018 INSC 360
Supreme Court Reports [2018] 3 S.C.R. 663 : 2018 INSC 360
Headnote

Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983: Revision petition – Dismissed by High Court – Propriety of – Held: Since the *Va Tech case (on which the High Court had relied on) has been overruled, order of High Court is set aside – Matter remanded to High Court.

Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority and Anr. v. L.G. Chaudhary Engineers and Contractors (2012) 2 SCC 495 : [2012] 2 SCR 162 – relied on.

*Va Tech Escher Wyass Flovel Ltd. v. MPSE Board & Another [2011] 13 SCC 261 – Stood overruled.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The following Order of the Court was delivered: ORDER 1. Delay condoned. Leave granted. 2. We have learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is not disputed by learned counsel for the parties that in view of judgment of this Court in Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority and Anr. v. L.G. Chaudhary Engineers and Contractors, (2012) 3 SCC 495 which has overruled the judgment of this Court in Va Tech Escher Wyass Flovel Ltd. v. MPSE Board & Another, (2011) 13 SCC 261, the impugned order has to be set aside and the matter remanded to the High Court which may deci
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →