LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/state-bank-of-india-vs-assistant-commissioner-of-income-tax-20221104/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

State Bank of India vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
4 November 2022
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 8181 of 2022
Result
Dismissed
Bench
Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sudhanshu Dhulia
Citation
[2022] 10 S.C.R. 51 : 2022 INSC 1165
Supreme Court Reports [2022] 10 S.C.R. 51 : 2022 INSC 1165
Headnote

Income Tax Act, 1961: ss. 10(5), 192(1), 201 – Deduction of tax at source from salary of employee – Consequences of failure to deduct or pay – Employees of assessee bank availed Leave Travel Concession (LTC) taking a circuitous route, they travelled not just within india but their journey involved a foreign leg also, and was also not the shortest route – Assessee bank while releasing payments to its employees as LTC, did not deduct the tax at source of its employees – Tribunal as also the High Court held the assessee bank in default for not deducting TDS of its employees – On appeal, held: Employees travelled to foreign and got full reimbursement u/s 10 – LTC is for travel within India – Moment employees undertake travel with a foreign leg, it is not a travel within India, thus, not covered under the provisions of s. 10(5) – A foreign travel also frustrates the basic purpose of LTC, which is to familiarise a civil servant or a Government employee to gain some perspective of Indian culture and it was for this reason that reimbursement of LTC was exempted – There was no intention of legislature to allow the employees to travel abroad in the garb of LTC available by virtue of s. 10(5) – Furthermore, the assessee-employer cannot claim ignorance about the travel plans of its employees as during settlement of LTC Bills the complete facts are available before the assessee about the details of their employees’ travels – It cannot be a case of bonafide mistake – Thus, the order passed by the High Court does not call for interference – Income Tax Rules – r. 2B.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Order of the Court was passed by SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J. 1. Leave granted. The appellant (State Bank of India) has challenged the judgement dated 13.01.2020 passed by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in ITA No. 05/2020 which has dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant and upheld the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 09.07.2019, holding the appellant as an assessee in default for the Assessment Year (AY) 2013-14, for not deducting TDS of its employees. 2. The question which has fallen for our consideration is whether the appellant was in default for
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →