LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/shiv-singh-ors-vs-state-of-himachal-pradesh-ors-20180425/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Shiv Singh & Ors. vs State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
25 April 2018
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 4414 of 2018
Result
Allowed
Bench
R.K. Agrawal, Abhay Manohar Sapre
Citation
[2018] 3 S.C.R. 947 : 2018 INSC 415
Supreme Court Reports [2018] 3 S.C.R. 947 : 2018 INSC 415
Headnote

Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 – s.15(2) – Non-compliance of, effect – Objections filed by the land owners challenging proposed acquisition – Non-submission of report by Collector to the appropriate government on the objections – Held: Under the scheme of the Act, once the objections are filed by the affected landowners, the same are required to be decided by the Collector under s.15(2) of the Act after affording an opportunity of being heard to the landowners, who submitted their objections and after making further inquiry, as the Collector may think necessary, he is required to submit his report to the appropriate Government for appropriate action in the acquisition in question – It is mandatory on the part of the Collector to comply with the procedure prescribed under s.15(2) so as to make the acquisition proceedings legal and in conformity with the provisions of the Act – In this case, the Collector neither gave any opportunity to the appellants as contemplated under s.15(2) nor submitted any report as provided under s.15(2) to the Government so as to enable the Government to take appropriate decision – Therefore, the Collector directed to decide the objections filed by the appellants keeping in view the requirements of s.15(2) and pass appropriate orders.

Allowing the appeal, the Court

HELD: It is not in dispute that the appellants had filed their objections to the proposed acquisition well within the time prescribed under Section 15 of the Act. There is non-compliance of Section 15(2) of the Act by the Collector. It is mandatory on the part of the Collector to comply with the procedure prescribed under Section 15(2) of the Act so as to make the acquisition proceedings legal and in conformity with the provisions of the Act. Respondent No.2 (Collector) is directed to decide the objections filed by the appellants keeping in view the requirements of Section 15(2) of the Act and pass appropriate orders. [Paras 6, 8 and 12][949-A, D-G]

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 01.11.2016 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in Writ Petition No. 2159 of 2016 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellants herein wherein the challenge was made to the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the respondent-State for acquisition of the appellants’ land. 3. In order to appreciate the issues involved in the appeal, few relevant facts need to be mentione
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →