LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/shirish-pandharinath-patil-vs-the-state-of-maharashtra-ors-20260903/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Shirish Pandharinath Patil vs The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
3 September 2026
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 12169 of 2026
Result
Allowed
Bench
Vipul Manubhai Pancholi, Aravind Kumar
Citation
[2026] 9 S.C.R. 428 : 2026 INSC 949
Acts & Sections
Constitution
Supreme Court Reports [2026] 9 S.C.R. 428 : 2026 INSC 949
Issue for consideration
Whether the order passed by the Scrutiny Committee, insofar as it invalidates the claim of the appellant of belonging to the “Tokre Koli” Scheduled Tribe, and the impugned judgment passed by the High Court affirming the same, warrant any interference; whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the retiral and pensionary benefits of the appellant ought to be protected.
Headnote

Service Law – Invalid Tribe Certificate – Exercise of power u/Art.142 of the Constitution of India to protect retiral and pensionary benefits – Claim of the appellant of belonging to the “Tokre Koli” Scheduled Tribe was invalidated by Scrutiny Committee – Order affirmed by High Court – Challenge to – Alternatively, appellant prayed for protection of the retiral and pensionary benefit since he has retired:

Held: Generally, invalidation of a caste or tribe claim upon verification would have consequences in law – However, in exceptional circumstances where equities of the case so warrant, the power u/Art.142 of the Constitution of India may be exercised to do complete justice – Appellant entered service with respondent No.3 in the year 1994 and continued in service until the date of his retirement on 30.06.2025, which is more than three decades, thus it is appropriate to ensure that he is not deprived of his retiral and pensionary benefits – During the pendency of this appeal, the appellant continued in service pursuant to the interim order of this Court dated 18.11.2021 and ultimately retired on attaining the age of superannuation – Further, the appellant has placed on record his affidavit stating that he has no children and that none of his family members has derived any benefit from the caste certificate issued to him – In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case, exercising power u/Art.142 of the Constitution of India, the service rendered by the appellant with respondent No.3 from 21.10.1994 until his date of retirement on 30.06.2025 is protected for the limited purpose of computation and release of his retiral and pensionary benefits, in accordance with the applicable service rules – Order passed by the Scrutiny Committee, insofar as it invalidates the claim of the appellant of belonging to the “Tokre Koli” Scheduled Tribe, and the impugned judgment passed by High Court affirming the same, do not warrant interference – Appellant entitled to the retiral and pensionary benefits – Constitution of India – Art.142. [Paras 12-14, 16]

Keywords: Invalid caste or tribe certificate · Article 142 of the Constitution of India · “Tokre Koli” Scheduled Tribe · Scrutiny Committee · Invalidation of a caste or tribe claim · Retiral and pensionary benefits · Service protected

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Divya Pandey. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Vipul M. Pancholi, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 15.09.2020 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition (St.) No. 92659 of 2020, whereby the High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant and affirmed the order dated 27.07.2020 passed by the respondent No. 2-Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee (for brevity “Scrutiny Committee”) invalidating the caste claim of the appellant as belonging to the “Tokre Koli” Scheduled Tribe, thereby cancelling and confiscating his caste certificate. 3. Th
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →