LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/shashi-bhushan-prasad-singh-vs-the-state-of-bihar-and-others-20241004/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Shashi Bhushan Prasad Singh vs The State of Bihar and Others

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
4 October 2024
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 11030 of 2024
Result
Disposed
Bench
Bela M. Trivedi, Satish Chandra Sharma
Citation
[2024] 10 S.C.R. 1344 : 2024 INSC 763
Acts & Sections
Bihar Water Resources Department… Bihar Water Resources Department… All-India Council of Technical Education…
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 10 S.C.R. 1344 : 2024 INSC 763
Issue for consideration
Despite the preparation of the Final Select List which signals the conclusion of the appointment process, the State Government sought to scrap the entire process and undertake a fresh appointment process under the New Rules. Whether this amounted to effectively changing the rules of the game after the game was played which is impermissible and deprives the candidates of their legitimate right of consideration under the previous Rules.
Headnote

Bihar Water Resources Department Subordinate Engineering (Civil) Cadre Recruitment Rules, 2015 – Bihar Water Resources Department Subordinate Engineering (Civil) Cadre Recruitment (Amendment) Rules 2017 – Recruitment – Appointment process – Bihar Technical Service Commission invited applications for vacancies to the post of Junior Engineer across various state departments vide Advertisement dated 08.03.2019 – The applications of the private respondents herein were found ineligible by the BTSC on the ground that their institutions were not approved by the All-India Council of Technical Education (AICTE) – Writ petitions were filed – After various orders of the High Court, a Final Select List was prepared on 19.12.2022, put under sealed cover and permission of the Court was sought by filing an interlocutory application – However, application was adjourned after Court was informed that the State Government was contemplating a review of the entire process – Later on 25.01.2023, decision was taken by the State Government inter alia to cancel the entire appointment process under the Advertisement and to initiate approval for the amended Rules:

Read the full headnote (1 more paragraph)

Held: In the instant case, despite the preparation of the Final Select List which signals the conclusion of the appointment process, the State Government seeks to scrap the entire process and undertake a fresh appointment process under the New Rules – In the considered opinion of this Court, this amounts to effectively changing the rules of the game after the game was played which is impermissible and deprives the candidates of their legitimate right of consideration under the previous Rules – The High Court in the impugned order has abruptly and without assigning reasons and without adjudicating any issues involved in the writ petitions, disposed of the same, recording the statement made by the counsel for the State, and permitted the State to amend Rules in question – Since, the entire recruitment process was concluded as per the extant Rules till the selection list was declared on 02.04.2022, which has not been specifically set aside by the High Court, and since the AICTE has also continued its stand that its approval is not necessary for the private institutions, and since the order dated 19.04.2022 (in which the first Select List was partly set aside) has attained finality, the interest of justice would be met if the State/Commission is directed to prepare a fresh select list of meritorious candidates in respect of the Advertisement dated 08.03.2019 – Hence, it is directed that a fresh selection list for the vacancies advertised in the Advertisement dated 08.03.2019 be prepared of the meritorious candidates in compliance with the order dated 19.04.2022 passed by the High Court – The Fresh Select List shall also include those meritorious candidates who were otherwise eligible but were declared ineligible solely on account of the 2017 amendment to the Rules i.e., on account of their institute not being recognised by the AICTE, and all similarly placed successful candidates. [Paras 26, 27, 29]

Keywords: Service Law · Recruitment · Appointment · Changing the rules of the game after the game was played · Legitimate right of consideration · All-India Council of Technical Education · Bihar Technical Service Commission

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Ankit Gyan. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Satish Chandra Sharma, J. 1. Leave Granted. 2. The present batch of appeals arise out of judgement dated 16.02.2023, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3411/2022 (‘CWJC’) along with other connected matters (the ‘Impugned Order’), whereby the Writ Petitioners who were the unsuccessful candidates in the Recruitment Process conducted pursuant to the Advertisement dated 08.03.2019 for the post of Junior Engineer (Civil), had challenged the vires of Rule 9(1)(ii) of the Bihar Water Resources Department Subordinate Engineering (Civil) Cadr
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →