LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/sarika-vs-administrator-mahakaleshwar-mandir-committee-ujjain-m-p-ors-20200901/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Sarika vs Administrator, Mahakaleshwar Mandir Committee, Ujjain (M.P.) & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
1 September 2020
Case No.
M.A. No. 1235 of 2019
Result
Dismissed
Bench
Arun Mishra, Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai, Krishna Murari
Citation
[2020] 9 S.C.R. 303 : 2020 INSC 528
Supreme Court Reports [2020] 9 S.C.R. 303 : 2020 INSC 528
Headnote

Religious heritage/monuments – Erosion of Shivalinga in Shri Mahakaleshwar Temple, Ujjain – Prevention of – Expert Committee consisting of experts of ASI and GSI appointed by Supreme Court vide order dated 02.05.2018 in Sarika v. Administrator, Shri Mahakaleshwar Mandir Committee, Ujjain (M.P.) & Ors. reported as [2018] 4 SCR 634 – Monitoring compliance of – Held: Considering the facts and circumstances of the Report submitted by the Expert Committee, Report of Temple Committee and the project report prepared by Ujjain Smart City Ltd., directions issued.

Issuing directions, the Court

Read the full headnote (4 more paragraphs)

HELD: Considering the facts and circumstances of the Report submitted by the Experts Committee dated 19.01.2019 and the Report of the Temple Committee as well as the project report prepared by the Ujjain Smart City Ltd., the following directions are issued:- (i) The Expert Committee shall visit the temple and submit a report by 15th December 2020, as to the steps to be taken to prevent deterioration of Shivlinga and the steps to be taken to preserve the temple structure, including Chandranageshwar Temple. (ii) The Committee to do a yearly survey and submit a report to this Court. (iii) Directions to preserve the Shivalingam. (iv) The Temple Committee shall provide water from Koti Thirth Kund filtered and purified and further maintain the required pH value. (v) Let the CBRI, Roorkee visit the temple, if necessary, and submit a project report as per its proposal dated 17.09.2019. CBRI, Roorkee, is directed to submit a project report regarding structural stability within six months. A sum of Rs. 41.30 Lakhs, as required by it, shall be paid by the Central Government as early as possible. (vi) Ujjain Smart City Ltd., as per its letter dated 27.08.2020, to undertake Mahakaal Rudrasagar Integrated Development Approach (Phase I and Phase II) forthwith and submit to this Court detailed project report and the time frame within six weeks. (vii) Let the details of necessary repairs, maintenance, and improvement be worked out and carried out forthwith. Let the Collector prepare a comprehensive plan for this purpose with the help of the Superintendent Engineer and available Architect. The State Government shall sanction fund immediately. Let a suitable plan and estimate be prepared within four weeks, and necessary repair and maintenance work be carried out urgently. (viii) The Expert Committee ordered the removal of modern additions, as noted at Item No. 20. They shall be removed, and the Temple Committee shall file a compliance report to this Court by 15th December, 2020. (ix) The original work in the temple is required to be restored. As assured by the Committee, let restoration work be done concerning eyesore painting by 15th December, 2020. The Temple Committee to ensure in future not to permit or resort to such painting and covering of the original work, objected by the Expert Committee. Let a report be submitted to this Court in this regard by 15th December, 2020. (x) The Collector and Superintendent of Police of Ujjain to ensure that encroachment within 500 mtrs. of the area of the temple premises are removed, as suggested by the Experts Committee. Let needful be done by 15th December, 2020, and a report be submitted to this Court.

(xi) Concerning the preservation and maintenance of Chandranageshwar Temple, a comprehensive plan be prepared and implemented, and be submitted to this Court for information.

(xii) If any area is slippery in Garbh Griha, the Temple Committee to ensure that the needful is done. (xiii) Let the necessary religious rituals be performed regularly along with other aspects as discussed in Para 5 of the order. [Para 9][308-D-H; 309-A-H; 310-A-G]

Sarika v. Administrator, Shri Mahakaleshwar Mandir Committee, Ujjain (M.P.) & Ors. [2018] 4 SCR 634 – referred to.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ARUN MISHRA, J. 1. This Court is monitoring the compliance of the judgment and order passed by this Court in Civil Appeal No. 4676/2018 on 02.05.2018. We have appointed an Expert Committee consisting of experts of Archaeological Survey of India and Geological Survey of India concerning the prevention of erosion of Shivalinga in Shri Mahakaleshwar Temple at Ujjain. The Expert Team visited Ujjain on 19.01.2019. Its Report indicates that there was erosion of Shivalinga after the last inspection, and it is a continuing process. The last inspection was m
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →