LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/sant-bhagwan-baba-shikshan-mandal-ors-vs-gunwant-ors-20240403/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Sant Bhagwan Baba Shikshan Mandal & Ors. vs Gunwant & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
3 April 2024
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 2225 of 2011
Result
Disposed
Bench
Hima Kohli, Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Citation
[2024] 5 S.C.R. 523 : 2024 INSC 405
Acts & Sections
Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools…
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 5 S.C.R. 523 : 2024 INSC 405
Issue for consideration
Whether the High Court was justified in allowing the writ petition filed by the respondent no.1 and appointing him to the post of Shikshan Sevak in the appellant no.3-school.
Headnote

Service Law – Appointment – Shikshan Sevak – Respondent no.1 was appointed as a peon in the appellant no.3-school – According to respondent no.1, he acquired requisite qualifications for the post of Shikshan Sevak and he had submitted several representations for the said post, but the same were not considered favourably – Appellant no.1 issued advertisement inviting application for appointment to the post of Shikshan Sevak – Respondent no.1 did not apply, instead after the post was filled by the appellants, respondent no.1 filed writ petition before the High Court – The writ petition was decided in favour of respondent no.1 – Correctness: Held: Once the respondent no.1 had acquired the requisite qualification in the course of his service with the respondent no. 3-School, and the relevant GR which was ultimately incorporated in the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Act, 1977, permitted appointment of a non-teaching employee in a school as a Shikshan Sevak subject to the employee acquiring the requisite educational qualifications and further, subject to such a post being available, the appellants cannot be heard to state that the respondent no.1 being a part of the non-teaching staff, was not entitled for being considered for appointment to the subject post – In fact, the language used in the regulation dated 10.06.2005, itself makes it clear that the employee was not required to take any steps by making a representation for being appointed to the post of a Shikshan Sevak and an obligation was cast on the appellants to ensure that on a permanent vacancy being available to the post of Shikshan Sevak, a member of the non-teaching staff, who would have acquired the educational qualification required for such a post, ought to be appointed directly – Therefore, the impugned judgment is well reasoned and does not require any interference. [Paras 11 and 12]

Keywords: Service Law · Appointment · Shikshan Sevak · Requisite qualifications · Non-teaching employee · Entitlement to appointment · Balancing equities · Senority · Retiral benefits

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Order 1. The appellants are aggrieved by the judgment dated 17th November, 2009, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, whereunder a Writ Petition1 filed by the respondent no.1 praying inter alia for being appointed to the post of Shikshan Sevak in the appellant no.3-School was allowed and the appellants were Writ Petition No. 1895 of 2007 directed to ensure that he is appointed to the subject post on or before 31st December, 2009, in accordance with law. 2. We may briefly advert to the relevant sequence of events. The respondent no.1 was appointed as a Peon in
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →