LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/roopwati-ors-vs-ram-kishan-ors-20221014/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Roopwati & Ors. vs Ram Kishan & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
14 October 2022
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 6818 of 2022
Result
Dismissed
Bench
Hemant Gupta, Sudhanshu Dhulia
Citation
[2022] 13 S.C.R. 561 : 2022 INSC 1089
Supreme Court Reports [2022] 13 S.C.R. 561 : 2022 INSC 1089
Headnote

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Motor accident resulting in death of a person – Compensation claim on his behalf by his wife, his son and his mother – Accident occurred when deceased was riding on a three-wheeler with his brother – The vehicle was being driven by respondent no. 1, and was insured with respondent no.3-insurance company – Tribunal was of the opinion that the accident did occur due to the rash and negligent driving by driver of the three-wheeler and fixed the liability on the insurance company – Total amount of compensation awarded by the Tribunal was Rs.4,33,000/- – Appeal – High Court awarded increased compensation on the opinion that the multiplier should have been thirteen instead of nine and the Tribunal was wrong in not granting any amount towards the future prospects – Therefore, the High Court increased the compensation awarded to Rs. 6,55,000/- and also increased the rate of interest from 7% to 7.5% – Held: The change of multiplier was granted by the High Court as the age of the deceased was wrongly recorded as

60 and was found to be 50 years, based on scientific evidence – High Court correctly awarded the compensation – Order of High Court upheld.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J. 1. This appeal is of the claimants, which arises out of the Impugned Judgment dated 26.09.2018 by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in an appeal against the order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (for short, the “Tribunal”) dated 13.05.2013. 2. The accident occurred on 22.11.2010 when the deceased Hari Ram was riding on a three-wheeler with his brother Dev Prasad from Mitrol to Palwal, Haryana. The vehicle was being driven by respondent no. 1, i.e., Ram Kishan and was insured with respondent no. 3 (IFFCO TOKIO G
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →