LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/reji-thomas-ors-vs-the-state-of-kerala-ors-20180419/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Reji Thomas & Ors. vs The State of Kerala & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
19 April 2018
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 4001 of 2018
Result
Disposed
Bench
Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha
Citation
[2018] 6 S.C.R. 805 : 2018 INSC 379
Supreme Court Reports [2018] 6 S.C.R. 805 : 2018 INSC 379
Headnote

Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, 1969 – s. 69 – Whether the High Court, in exercise of its power u/Art. 226 of the Constitution could extend the statutory period prescribed u/s.69(3), within which an election petition under the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, 1969 could be entertained – Held: s.69 of the Act is the mechanism provided by the State Legislature as contemplated u/Art. 243 ZK (2) of the Constitution of India – Once the mechanism provided under the Statute provides for a time schedule for preferring an election petition, then in the absence of a provision in the Statute for enlarging the time under any given circumstances, no court, whether the High Court u/Art. 226 or Supreme Court u/Arts. 32, 136 or 142 of the Constitution can extend the period in election matters – In the matter of limitation in election cases, the Court has to adopt strict interpretation of the provisions – Matter remitted to High Court for consideration afresh – Constitution of India – Art.243 ZK(2) – Election Laws – Limitation – Interpretation of Statutes.

Disposing of the matters, the Court

HELD: The matters need to be considered afresh by the High Court since the Court could not have relegated the parties to the alternative remedy under the Statute by enlarging the time for preferring the election dispute. Accordingly, the impugned Judgment to that extent is set aside. The writ petitions are remitted to the High Court for fresh consideration. It will be open to the parties to raise all available contentions before the High Court. [Para 14] [813-C-D]

Smita Subhash Sawant v. Jagdeeshwari Jagdish Amin & Ors. (2015) 12 SCC 169 : [2015] 9 SCR 600 ; Union of India & Anr. v. Kirloskar Pneumatic Co. Ltd. (1996) 4 SCC 453 : [1996] 2 Suppl. SCR 326 – relied on.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KURIAN, J. SLP (C) No. 15765 of 2017 and SLP (C) Nos.15768-15772 of 2017 1. Leave granted. 2. Whether the High Court, in exercise of its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India could have extended the statutory period, within which an Election Petition under the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, 1969 (in short, “the Act”) should have been entertained, is the legal question arising for consideration in these appeals. 3. The dispute pertains to the election to the Thiruvalla East Cooperative Bank Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as, “Coo
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →