LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/rajalakshmi-vs-the-special-tahsildar-la-koyilandy-another-20230410/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Rajalakshmi vs The Special Tahsildar (La) Koyilandy & Another

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
10 April 2023
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 2363 of 2023
Result
Disposed
Bench
M.R. Shah, C.T. Ravikumar
Citation
[2023] 2 S.C.R. 870 : 2023 INSC 333
Supreme Court Reports [2023] 2 S.C.R. 870 : 2023 INSC 333
Headnote

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Just and fair compensation – Lands in question were acquired for setting up of an IT Park – Many landowners accepted the compensation at negotiated price of Rs. 1,00,000/- per cent – Present landowners dissatisfied, references made u/s.18 – Reference Court enhanced the compensation – High Court awarded the compensation at the rate of Rs. 1,35,000/- per cent by giving 35% rise to the negotiated price of Rs. 1,00,000/- per cent – Correctness of – Held: High Court rightly took into consideration the negotiated price for which the other various landowners sold their land for the very project for a sale consideration of Rs. 1,00,000/- per cent – However, taking into consideration the location of the lands in question, granting 35% rise to the negotiated price of Rs.1,00,000/- per cent is on a lower side – Landowners are entitled to just and fair compensation – 60% rise granted to the negotiated price – Thus, compensation awarded at the rate of Rs.1,60,000/- per cent instead of Rs. 1,35,000/- per cent – Impugned judgments/orders modified to the aforesaid extent.

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Determination of compensation – Negotiated price – Held: Landowners aggrieved by the amount of compensation determined by the Land Acquisition Officer are not bound by the negotiated price agreed by the other landowners, however, in the present case, the same can be said to be a relevant consideration for determining the compensation.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHAH, J. 1. As common question of law and facts arise in these appeals, all these appeals are decided and disposed of together by this common judgment and order. 2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgments and orders dated 30.05.2018/28.05.2018/10.08.2022 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Land Acquisition Appeal No. 359/2017 and other allied appeals and cross objections, by which the High Court has determined and awarded the compensation for the lands acquired at the rate of Rs.1,35,000/- per cent, the o
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →