LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/rahul-vs-national-insurance-company-ltd-and-another-20240809/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Rahul vs National Insurance Company Ltd. and Another

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
9 August 2024
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 8614 of 2024
Result
Allowed
Bench
Sudhanshu Dhulia, R Mahadevan
Citation
[2024] 8 S.C.R. 287 : 2024 INSC 598
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 8 S.C.R. 287 : 2024 INSC 598
Issue for consideration
High Court, if justified in reducing the percentage of disability suffered by the pillion rider who met with an accident from 25% as fixed by the tribunal, to 20% while determining the compensation payable to him.
Headnote

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Motor accident – Compensation – Reduction of the percentage of disability suffered in a motor accident by the claimant-pillion rider on a motorcycle from 25% as fixed by the tribunal to 20% by the High Court and re-assessed the compensation – Correctness:

Held: Pillion rider underwent a surgery in which, plates and screws were implanted in his hands – As per disability certificate issued by the doctor, the pillion rider suffered 50% permanent disablement and the said doctor was also examined as prosecution witness – Considering the oral and documentary evidence, the tribunal took the disability of the pillion rider only at 25% and determined the compensation payable to him – Without assigning plausible reason, the High Court re-assessed the compensation by reducing the disability suffered by the pillion rider to 20% – Reduction of compensation was not required, when there was no basis in support thereof – Thus, the judgment passed by the High Court set aside and that of the tribunal fixing the disability of the pillion rider at 25% restored. [Paras 10, 11]

Keywords: Reducing the percentage of disability suffered · Compensation · Motor accident · Disability certificate · Permanent disablement · Reduction of compensation

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment R. Mahadevan, J. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted. 3. In the present case, the appellant challenges the final judgment dated 13.11.2018 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, (hereinafter shortly referred to as “the High Court”), thereby partly allowing MFA No. 103118/2014 (MV) filed by the Respondent No.1 (hereinafter referred to as “the insurance company”). 4. Originally, the appellant filed a claim petition in MAC No.1587 of 2013 before the Senior Civil Judge & MACT at Raibag (hereinafter shortly referred to as “the Tribunal”), seeking a compensation of Rs. 2
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →