LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/priyanka-kumari-and-ors-vs-the-state-of-bihar-and-ors-20260218/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Priyanka Kumari and Ors. vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
18 February 2026
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 797 of 2026
Result
Allowed
Bench
Rajesh Bindal
Citation
[2026] 3 S.C.R. 266 : 2026 INSC 167
Acts & Sections
Chhattisgarh Niji Kshetra Vishwavidyalaya…
Supreme Court Reports [2026] 3 S.C.R. 266 : 2026 INSC 167
Issue for consideration
The appellants herein were dismissed from the post of librarian on which they were appointed by the State of Bihar. It was on account of the fact that the degree obtained by them from the University of Technology and Science, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, was declared invalid as the Chhattisgarh Niji Kshetra Vishwavidyalaya Act, 2002 under which the University was established, was later on declared to be ultra vires.
Headnote

Chhattisgarh Niji Kshetra Vishwavidyalaya Act, 2002 – The University in question (mentioned at serial no.23) was granted recognition by the State of Chhattisgarh under the provisions of the 2002 Act – After getting admission in the aforesaid University, the appellants passed out with a degree of Bachelor of Library Science (B.Lib) in the year 2004 – The aforesaid Act was declared to be ultra vires by this Court vide order dated 11.02.2005 – Thereafter, the State of Bihar issued an advertisement for recruitment to the post of librarians and appellants were selected – PIL was filed raising an issue that certain persons have been appointed as librarians on the basis of qualification obtained by pursuing the courses from the University, which was not a recognized institution – PIL was dismissed – However, the State took action and the services of the appellants were terminated – Correctness: Held: What is evident from the facts of the case is that the University from which the appellants had studied had been set up under the 2002 Act enacted by the Chhattisgarh State Legislature – The aforesaid Act was declared to be ultra vires by this Court vide order dated 11.02.2005 – Till such time, the students had been studying and passing out – At the time of declaration of the said Act to be ultra vires, this Court had protected the students who were still studying – They were directed to be transferred to alternative institutions recognized by the State – Considering the aforesaid fact and also that in the factual situation in hand, the appellants cannot be said to be at fault as they had studied in the University, which has been set up under the 2002 Act enacted by the State Legislature – Hence, they should not be deprived of the benefits of the degree obtained by them while studying in the University – It is not the case of the State that the University in which the appellants studied was bogus or no study was actually imparted – Accordingly, the orders vide which the services of the appellants were terminated is declared as illegal – Appellants are directed to be reinstated back in service, with continuity – However, they are not entitled to any back wages. [Paras 16-18]

Keywords: Education · Degree · Protection of students · Benefits of degree · Service Law · Termination · University · Unrecognised University · Reinstatement · Back wages

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Ankit Gyan. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Rajesh Bindal, J. 1. The appellants in Civil Appeal No. 797 of 2026 are aggrieved against the judgment dated 11.04.2019, passed by the High Court1 in Letters Patent Appeal No. 671 of 2018. The High Court dismissed the appeal against the order of the Single Judge dated 22.02.2018 passed in Civil Writ Petition No. 6827 of 2016, thereby affirming the termination of services of the petitioners therein. 1.1 The appellants in Civil Appeal No. 798 and 799 of 2026 are before this Court, aggrieved against the dismissal of Letters Patent Appeal No. 567 of 2018 by the High Court vide order da
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →