LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/pr-commissioner-of-income-tax-6-vs-nokia-india-pvt-ltd-20190408/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax 6 vs Nokia India Pvt. Ltd.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
8 April 2019
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 3450 of 2019
Result
Allowed
Bench
Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dinesh Maheshwari
Citation
[2019] 6 S.C.R. 478 : 2019 INSC 476
Supreme Court Reports [2019] 6 S.C.R. 478 : 2019 INSC 476
Headnote

Income Tax Act, 1961 – ss.260-A, 148 – Assessing officer (AO) issued notice to the respondent u/s.148 – Objections raised by the respondent were accepted by the ITAT – Aggrieved, Revenue filed appeal in the High Court – High Court dismissed the appeal in limine on the ground that it did not involve any substantial question of law within the meaning of s.260A of the Act – On appeal, held: The order of the High Court legally not sustainable – The following four questions need to be answered by the High Court on their respective merits while deciding the appeal filed by the Revenue u/s.260-A of the Act – (i)Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that the notice issued by the AO u/s.148 was bad in law when admittedly the impugned notice was issued in the case where the assessment was made u/s.143(1) of the Act but not u/s.143(3) of the Act – (ii)Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that the notice issued u/s.148 of the Act was bad because it was based on mere change of opinion by overlooking the fact that there was no foundation to form any such opinion – (iii) When admittedly the notice in question satisfied the requirements of s.148 of the Act as it stood, namely, that first, it contained the facts constituting the “reasons to believe” and second, it furnished the necessary details for assessing the escaped income of the assessee, whether the ITAT was still justified in declaring the notice as being bad in law without taking into consideration any of these admitted facts – (iv) In case, if the notice is held proper and legal, whether the finding recorded by the ITAT on the merits of the case on each item, which is subject matter of the notice, is legally sustainable – Thus, case remanded to the High Court for answering the aforementioned questions on merits in accordance with law.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 21.04.2017 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in ITA No.854 of 2016 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant herein. 3. A few facts need mention hereinbelow for the disposal of this appeal, which involves a short point. 4. By impugned order, the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the Revenue’s (appellant herein) appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →