Service Law – Regularisation of service – Denial of – Held: Non-regularisation of the services of the appellant is a violation of the fundamental rights of equality before law and equality of opportunity in matters relating to employment under the State, as enshrined u/Articles 14 and 16(1) – The principles of natural justice, too, demand that the appellant cannot be denied the benefit of the regularisation of services when his similarly placed fellow employees were granted the said benefit – Appellant entitled to receive back wages and benefits from 1991 with 10% interest – Judgment of the High Court set aside – Constitution of India – Articles 14, 16 – Principles of Natural Justice.
Secretary, State of Karnataka vs Umadevi (2006) 4 SCC
1 : [2006] 3 SCR 953 – held inapplicable.
UP SEB vs Pooran Chandra Pandey (2007) 11 SCC
92 : [2007] 10 SCR 920 – relied on.
Surjeet Singh Sahni vs State of U.P. & Ors. 2022 SCC OnLine SC 249; Union of India v. Vartak Labour Union (2011) 4 SCC 200: [2011] 4 SCR 509 – referred to.
As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.