LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/meera-devi-d-thr-lr-vs-dinesh-chandra-joshi-d-thr-lrs-20240919/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Meera Devi (D) Thr. Lr. vs Dinesh Chandra Joshi (D) Thr. Lrs.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
19 September 2024
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 5577 of 2014
Result
Allowed
Bench
J.K. Maheshwari, Rajesh Bindal
Citation
[2024] 9 S.C.R. 677 : 2024 INSC 725
Acts & Sections
TP Act The Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings…
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 9 S.C.R. 677 : 2024 INSC 725
Issue for consideration
When the case falls in the category where the respondent-tenant has failed to comply with the order passed by the Supreme Court directing payment of rent.
Headnote

Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 – Eviction of the respondent-tenant was sought by the appellant-landlady on the ground of non-payment of rent:

Held: A perusal of the paperbook shows that notice was issued on 02.01.2014 in the Special Leave Petition – Vide order dated 02.05.2014, leave was granted and a perusal of the same order shows that during the pendency of the appeal the respondent-tenant was directed to pay rent at the rate of ₹4,000/- per month – Legal representative of M, filed an affidavit dated 21.02.2024, in which it has been stated that respondent-tenant has not paid the amount fixed by this Court from March 2017 – In reply to the aforesaid affidavit, no response was filed by the respondent-tenant – In any rent proceeding, the Courts can always take the subsequent facts into consideration, which may be relevant – Here is a case where the respondent-tenant has failed to comply with the interim order passed by this Court regarding payment of rent during the pendency of the appeal before this Court, and hence, is in default – In any proceeding of eviction of tenant on the ground of non-payment of rent, he is not only bound to offer the arrears of rent on account of non-payment of which eviction is sought for but also to pay the future rent regularly, either at the amount agreed between the parties or as fixed by the Court – Even on failure to pay the rent during the pendency of the litigation also the tenant is bound to be evicted – In view of the above, this Court is of the view that the case falls in that category where the respondent-tenant has failed to comply with the order passed by this dated 02.05.2014, directing payment of rent at the rate of ₹4,000/- per month, from March 2017 onwards – Hence, the respondent-tenant, who is now represented through his legal representatives/heirs, is directed to be evicted forthwith. [Paras 7, 8, 9, 10]

Keywords: Eviction · Rent · Default in payment of rent · Rent proceeding · Eviction of tenant · Non-payment of rent · Arrears of rent

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Ankit Gyan. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Rajesh Bindal, J. 1. The landlady is in appeal before this Court impugning the judgment of the High Court1 passed in Writ Petition2 filed by the respondenttenant. The challenge in the Writ Petition was against the common judgment dated 12.05.2006 passed by Additional District Judge, Jhansi in SCC Revision No. 40 of 2003 and SCC Revision High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Writ – A No. 30694 of 2006 No. 47 of 2003, filed by the respondent-tenant and appellant-landlady, respectively. 2. As is evident from a perusal of the orders passed in the case in hand, eviction of the respon
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →