LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/meenakshi-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-20240723/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Meenakshi vs The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
23 July 2024
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 8473 of 2024
Result
Partly allowed
Bench
Hima Kohli, Sandeep Mehta
Citation
[2024] 7 S.C.R. 1433 : 2024 INSC 573
Acts & Sections
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1433 : 2024 INSC 573
Issue for consideration
Whether perquisites/allowances in the nature of house rent allowance, flexible benefit plan and company contribution to provident fund can be excluded from the basic salary of the deceased while applying the principle of rise in income by future prospects for assessing compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Headnote

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Claim for compensation – Perquisites/allowances in the nature of house rent, flexible benefit plan and company contribution to provident fund cannot be excluded from the basic salary for the purpose of applying future prospects – High Court erred in excluding them – High Court justified in deducting Income Tax from the gross salary of the deceased for calculating his gross income – Appeal partly allowed:

Held: Claim for compensation by deceased’s mother – High Court vide impugned judgment reduced compensation amount awarded by Accident Claims Tribunal – It excluded the components of house rent allowance, flexible benefit plan and contribution to provident fund etc. from the gross income for the purpose of applying future prospects – It also deducted income tax from the gross salary – Appeal partly allowed – High Court erred in omitting to add components of house rent allowance, flexible benefit plan and company contribution to provident fund to the basic salary of the deceased – However, High Court justified in deducting income tax from the gross salary while calculating the gross income – Compensation amount re-assessed. [Paras 12-15]

Keywords: Claim · Compensation · MACT · Arrear of rent · Loss of dependency · Principle of rise in income by future prospects · House rent allowance · Flexible benefit plan · Company contribution to provident fund · Income tax deduction · Basic salary of the deceased

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Aishani Narain, Hony. Associate Editor (Verified by: Shibani Ghosh, Adv.). Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Order 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted. 3. This appeal arises from the judgment dated 2nd August, 2017 rendered by the learned Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench in M.F.A. No. 200311/2016 (MV) whereby, while partly accepting the appeal preferred by the respondent No. 1- Insurance Company,1 the High Court reduced the compensation Respondent no. 2 was deleted vide order dated 28th August, 2023 by the Hon’ble Judge-in-Chamber awarded to the claimant i.e., Appellant herein vide award dated 25th November, 2015 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and MACT2
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →