Motor Vehicles Act, 1988:ss. 140, 166 rw s.171 – Compensation – Enhancement of – Death of 12 year old boy in a motor accident – Tribunal awarded lump sum compensation of Rs. 1,50,000/-, while the High Court enhanced it to Rs. 2,00,000/- up to the value of the claim petition – On appeal, held: Less valuation, if any, made in the claim petition would not be impediment to award just compensation exceeding the claimed amount – Tribunal/court ought to award ‘just’ compensation which is reasonable in the facts relying upon the evidence produced on record – On facts, the amount of compensation not just and reasonable looking to the computation made – As per the ocular statement of the mother of the deceased, it is clear that deceased was a brilliant student, studying in a private school, thus, accepting the notional earning as Rs. 30,000/- including future prospect and applying the multiplier of 15, the loss of dependency comes to Rs. 4,50,000/- and adding Rs. 50,000/- in conventional heads, the total sum of compensation would be Rs. 5,00,000/- – Thus, the compensation as awarded by the High Court enhanced by Rs. 3,00,000/-, in addition. Kishan Gopal and another vs. Lala and others (2014)
1 SCC 244 : [2013] 10 SCR 793 – relied on.
R.K. Malik and another vs. Kiran Pal and others (2009)
14 SCC 1 : [2009] 10 SCR 87; Sarla Verma & Others vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another (2009) 6 SCC 121 : [2009] 5 SCR 1098; Lata Wadhwa and others vs. State of Bihar and others (2001) 8 SCC 197 : [2001] 1 Suppl. SCR 578; M.S. Grewal & another vs. Deep Chand Sood & others (2001) 8 SCC 151 : [2001]
2 Suppl. SCR 156; Kurvan Ansari @ Kurvan Ali & another vs. Shyam Kishore Murmu and another (2022)
1 SCC 317; Nagappa vs. Gurdayal Singh and others (2003) 2 SCC 274 : [2002] 4 Suppl. SCR 499 – referred to.
Taff Vale Rly. Vs. Jankins 1913 AC 1 – referred to.
As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.