LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/mamta-devi-ors-vs-the-reliance-general-insurance-company-limited-anr-20230519/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Mamta Devi & Ors. vs The Reliance General Insurance Company Limited & Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
19 May 2023
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 3904 of 2023
Result
Partly allowed
Bench
J.K. Maheshwari, Aravind Kumar
Citation
[2023] 10 S.C.R. 1133 : 2023 INSC 566
Supreme Court Reports [2023] 10 S.C.R. 1133 : 2023 INSC 566
Headnote

Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 – s.20 – Notification issued under – “Contested claim” – When not – Deceased who was employed by the second respondent as truck driver met with a road accident and succumbed to the injuries – Compensation sought by appellants-his wife, son and parents – Deputy Labour Commissionercum-Commissioner for Workmen Compensation awarded Rs.4,31,671/- and with interest @ 6% p.a – Challenged by appellants – High Court held that the award itself was without jurisdiction on the ground that it was a contested matter on account of the written statement filed by the insurer and there being a embargo as per notification issued u/s. 20(1) & (2) – Held: Employer had clearly admitted the averments made in the claim petition filed by the appellants – There was no contest– Insurer of the offending vehiclefirst respondent having filed the written statement did not cross examine the appellants and their witnesses – Thus, the claim lodged by them seeking compensation would not partake the character of a “contested claim” as stipulated under the notification issued by the appropriate Govt. u/s.20 (1) and (2), where under clause (a), the presiding officers of the Labour Court were entrusted with adjudication of claims of all contested cases arising under the Act – Therefore, the High Court erred in holding that the claim petition was not maintainable before the Deputy Labour Commissioner-cumCommissioner and appellants had to pursue their grievance before the jurisdictional Labour Court – Impugned judgment set aside – Further, unchallenged statement of the wife of the deceased that he was earning Rs.6,000/- per month, accepted – Appellants entitled to compensation of Rs.6,64,110/- with interest @ 12% p.a. from one month from the date of accident till date of payment excluding the amount already paid/deposited by the first respondent – Compensation – Maxims – Coram-non-judice.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ARAVIND KUMAR, J. Leave granted. 1. A challenge is laid to the correctness and legality of the judgment dated 01.10.2018 passed in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 777 of 2014 by the High Court of Judicature at Patna, whereunder, the appeal filed by the claimants assailing the order dated 10.10.2014 passed by the Deputy Labour Commissioner-cum-Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, in CWC No. 24 of 2011 allowing the claim petition in part, directing the opposite party No. 1 - Reliance General Insurance Company Limited (first respondent herein) to pay compe
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →