LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/madhya-pradesh-rural-road-development-authority-and-anr-vs-backbone-enterprises-limited-and-anr-20180418/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority and Anr. vs Backbone Enterprises Limited and Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
18 April 2018
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 4011 of 2018
Result
Disposed
Bench
Adarsh Kumar Goel, R.F. Nariman
Citation
[2018] 4 S.C.R. 268 : 2018 INSC 360
Supreme Court Reports [2018] 4 S.C.R. 268 : 2018 INSC 360
Headnote

Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983:

Arbitration proceedings – Jurisdiction of Arbitration Tribunal – Held: *Va Tech case on which the impugned order had relied on, had since been overruled, the impugned order is set aside – Matter is remanded to Arbitration Tribunal to decide the case on merit. *Va Tech Escher Wyass Flovel Ltd. v. MPSE Board & Another (2011) 13 SCC 261 – Stood overruled.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The following Order of the Court was passed: ORDER 1. Delay condoned. Leave granted. 2. In view of judgment of this Court in Va Tech Escher Wyass Flovel Ltd. v. MPSE Board & Another, (2011) 13 SCC 261 having been overruled and as the High Court has relied on Judgment in C.R. NO.353 of 2004, Mahesh Chandra Garg v. State of M.P. and Ors. decided on 23.2.2010 which was based on Va Tech (supra), the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the M.P. Arbitration Tribunal so that the said Tribunal can deal with the matter on merits in accordance with law. 3. The appeals are dispo
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →