LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/m-thanigivelu-and-ors-vs-tamil-nadu-electricity-board-and-ors-20260311/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

M. Thanigivelu and Ors. vs Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
11 March 2026
Case No.
Civil Appeal No(s). 862 of 2026
Result
Allowed
Bench
Rajesh Bindal
Citation
[2026] 3 S.C.R. 432 : 2026 INSC 229
Acts & Sections
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Service…
Supreme Court Reports [2026] 3 S.C.R. 432 : 2026 INSC 229
Issue for consideration
Dispute pertains to inter-se seniority of the Assistant Engineers (Electrical)-directly recruited and internally selected candidates, and what is to be taken as the date of the appointment of the direct recruits.
Headnote

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Service Regulations, 1967 – Regn 10(9), 87, 97 – Seniority – Inter-se seniority of the Assistant Engineers (Electrical)-directly recruited and internally selected candidates – Date of the appointment of direct recruits – Seniority of direct recruit to be counted from the first date of their joining after which they were sent for training or from the date the candidate starts his probation:

Held: From the plain language used in the Regulation, it is evident that seniority is to be counted from the placement of a candidate in the merit list which is prepared at the time when recruitment takes place – As provision has been made for two years’ probation after selection, different candidates may join on different dates during the permitted joining time – Period of probation he had to undergo will remain two years from the date he joins duty – Merit will not affect completion of probation – Training is a part of service which is imparted after an incumbent joins duty – Even Regulations treat this as a part of duty – Merely payment of consolidated sum during the period of training and regular scale when the probation starts will not make any difference – That is why Regn 97 does not say anything to the contrary to what is clearly provided in Regns 10(9) and 87 – No Regulation cited from which it can be inferred that the seniority is to be counted from the date a candidate starts his probation – Anything said either in the appointment letter or in any of the BPs which runs contrary to the plain language of Regn 10(9) and 87 will not stand in the way for this Court to form an opinion that the seniority of a direct recruit is to be counted from the first date of their joining after which they were sent for training – Period thus, is irrelevant, it may change from time to time – Impugned judgment passed by the High Court set aside – Opinion expressed by the Division Bench that the seniority will commence from the date the candidate starts his probation totally erroneous and not supported by the plain language used in Regulations. [Paras 19-25]

Keywords: Inter-se seniority · Assistant Engineers (Electrical) · Direct recruits · Internally selected candidates · Date of the appointment of the direct recruits · Seniority · Selection of direct recruits internal Probation · Training

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Rajesh Bindal, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This judgment will dispose of a bunch of appeals involving identical issues. Vide common judgment1, passed by the Division Bench of the High Court2, seven writ appeals3 were disposed of. The Division Bench of the High Court had set aside the order passed by the Single Bench whereby writ petitions filed by the private respondents herein were dismissed. The dispute pertains to inter-se seniority of the Assistant Engineers (Electrical)4, directly recruited and internally selected candidates. The appellants are the direct recruits, and the private
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →