LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/m-s-plr-projects-pvt-ltd-vs-mahanadi-coalfields-ltd-ors-20210420/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

M/s. Plr Projects Pvt. Ltd. vs Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
20 April 2021
Case No.
Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 2419 of 2019
Result
Dismissed
Bench
S.A. Bobde, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Surya Kant
Citation
[2021] 4 S.C.R. 153 : 2021 INSC 262
Supreme Court Reports [2021] 4 S.C.R. 153 : 2021 INSC 262
Headnote

Judiciary – Appointment of High Court Judges – Vacancies in High Courts – Certain timelines were stated for appointment of Judges to the High Court in the Memorandum of Procedure as finalized by the Supreme Court Collegium on 10.03.2017 – In order to facilitate timely appointment, following additional timelines advised – The Intellligence Bureau (IB) would submit its report/inputs within 4 to 6 weeks from the date of recommendation of the High Court Collegium, to the Central Government – The Central Government would then forward the file(s)/recommendations to the Supreme Court within 8 to 12 weeks from the date of receipt of views from the State Government and the report/input from the IB – The Government would thereafter proceed to make the appointment immediately on the aforesaid consideration – In case of Government’s reservations on suitability or in public interest, within the same period of time it may be sent back to the Supreme Court Collegium with the specific reasons for reservation recorded – If the Supreme Court Collegium after consideration of the aforesaid inputs still reiterates the recommendation(s) unanimously (Cl. 24.1), such appointment should be processed and appointment should be made within 3 to 4 weeks.

Third Judge’s case (1998) 7 SCC (Special Reference

1 of 1998) – referred to

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The following order of the Court was passed: ORDER 1. The High Courts are in a crisis situation. There are almost 40% vacancies in the High Courts, with many of the larger High Courts working under 50% of their sanctioned strength. 2. We have discussed in detail the aforesaid while dealing with the aspect of appointment of ad hoc Judges under Article 224A of the Constitution of India in WP(C) No.1236/2019. Vide separate order in the aforementioned matter passed today, we have also discussed the process of appointment under Articles 217 & 224 of the Constitution of India. 3. Learned Attorne
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →