LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/m-s-chithra-woods-manors-welfare-association-vs-shaji-augustine-20250424/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

M/s Chithra Woods Manors Welfare Association vs Shaji Augustine

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
24 April 2025
Case No.
CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 712/2023
Result
Disposed
Bench
Abhay S. Oka, Augustine George Masih
Citation
[2025] 4 S.C.R. 2707 : 2025 INSC 567
Acts & Sections
Contempt of Court Act, 1971
Supreme Court Reports [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2707 : 2025 INSC 567
Issue for consideration
Whether the Respondent-alleged contemnor is guilty of civil contempt for non-compliance of the directions issued by this Court vide Order dated 07.11.2022.
Headnote

Contempt of Court Act, 1971 – s.2(b) – Civil contempt – When – Agreement entered between the Petitioner-Association and Respondent permitted the latter to occupy and use the Property of the Petitioner for 10 years on payment of licence fees – Persistent defaults in the payment of licence fees by the Respondent – Litigation between parties across forums; settlement Agreement arrived at however, Respondent again defaulted in making payment thereunder – Eventually, matter reached this court; vide order dtd. 07.11.2022 as an interim measure, Respondent was directed to pay arrears of use and occupation charges in six monthly instalments – Non-compliance by the Respondent alleging financial incapabilities – Contempt Petition filed by the Association: Held: Civil contempt means wilful disobedience of judgment, decree, or direction, order, writ or other process of the Court or wilful breach of an undertaking given to the Court – All throughout, the Respondent had been in possession of the property and utilising the income generated from running of the said resort – Non-fulfilment of the mandate and direction of this Court which were at the request of the Respondent himself reflects his intent to not comply with the order rather to violate the same with impunity – The conduct clearly reflects that the intention of the Respondent was to gain the benefit by running the resort in the subject property without paying the current liability, what to say of the arrears – A party, misguiding the Court to pass an order which was never intended to be complied with, would constitute an act of overawing the due process of law and, thus, commit contempt of Court – From the very beginning till the very end the Respondent took the Court for a ride – There has been intentional and deliberate non-compliance on the part of the Respondent of the order passed by this Court, contempt of which stands committed, but on getting an interim order of continuing in possession usurped the earnings instead of paying off the dues – Therefore, the malafide is writ large – Respondent guilty of Civil Contempt – 3 months simple imprisonment imposed with fine of INR 20,000/- – However, 30 days granted as one more opportunity to purge the contempt and comply with the Order dtd. 07.11.2022. [Paras 28, 31, 36, 41, 42]

Keywords: Contempt of Court · Civil contempt · Wilful disobedience · Nonpayment of arrears of use and occupation charges · Malafide intention · Misguiding the Court · Misuse of the process of court · Intentional and deliberate non-compliance of the order of court · Wilful breach of an undertaking given to the Court · Not approaching the Court with clean hands · Tarnish the image of judiciary

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Divya Pandey. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Augustine George Masih, J. 1. The instant Contempt Petition (Civil) No. 712 of 2023 (hereinafter referred to as “instant Petition”) in SLP (C) No. 17433 of 2021 (hereinafter referred to as “main Petition”) was filed during its pendency by M/s Chithra Woods Manors Welfare Association, being the Respondent No. 01 therein (hereinafter referred to as “Petitioner Association”), alleging non-payment of arrears of use and occupation charges for period between 20.09.2021 and 31.11.2022 in six monthly instalments beginning 31.12.2022, as directed by this Court vide Order dated 07.11.2022 in
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →