LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/krishnoji-rao-rao-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-20250421-3/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal

Krishnoji Rao @ Rao vs The State Of Karnataka

Court
Karnataka High Court
Date
21 April 2025
Case No.
CRL.P No. 11791 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 3598 of 2022, CRL.P No. 3609 of 2022, CRL.P No. 3717 of 2022, CRL.P No. 9767 of 2022, CRL.P No. 9780 of 2022, CR
Bench
Mohammad Nawaz J
Acts & Sections
CrPC §482 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 §528 IPC §409 IPC §420 IPC §465 IPC §468
Also reported in
This judgment disposed of connected matters. The same reasons were delivered in the following 8 cases.
Krishnoji Rao vs The State Of Karnataka
CRL.P No. 11791 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 3598 of 2022, CRL.P No. 3609 of 2022 and 18 Others
Krishnoji Rao vs The State Of Karnataka
CRL.P No. 11791 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 3598 of 2022, CRL.P No. 3609 of 2022 and 18 Others
Mr. M. K. Sanjay Kumar vs The State - Through The
CRL.P No. 11791 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 3598 of 2022, CRL.P No. 3609 of 2022 and 18 Others
Krishnoji Rao vs The State Of Karnataka
CRL.P No. 11791 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 3598 of 2022, CRL.P No. 3609 of 2022 and 18 Others
Krishnoji Rao @ Rao vs The State Of Karnataka
CRL.P No. 11791 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 3598 of 2022, CRL.P No. 3609 of 2022 and 18 Others
Krishnoji Rao @ Rao vs The State Of Karnataka
CRL.P No. 11791 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 3598 of 2022, CRL.P No. 3609 of 2022 and 18 Others
Mr. M K Sanjay Kumar vs The State - Through
CRL.P No. 11791 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 3598 of 2022, CRL.P No. 3609 of 2022 and 18 Others
Krishnoji Rao vs The State Of Karnataka
CRL.P No. 11791 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 3598 of 2022, CRL.P No. 3609 of 2022 and 18 Others
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
These are a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (now Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) along with a Writ Petition, seeking quashing of FIRs registered by the Sheshadripuram Police Station, Bengaluru (later transferred to CCB), for offences punishable under Sections 409, 420, 465, 468, 471, 472, and 120B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIRs arose out of alleged criminal misconduct involving officials and others connected with the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA).

The petitioners, including Krishnoji Rao, M.K. Sanjay Kumar, and Anil Kumar R, challenged the registration and continuance of criminal proceedings pending before the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, primarily on grounds including that the FIRs disclosed no cognizable offence or were otherwise liable to be quashed in exercise of the High Court's inherent powers.

The Karnataka High Court, before the Hon'ble Mr Justice Mohammad Nawaz, took up the connected matters together for hearing and adjudication, given the common questions of law and fact arising out of the same set of FIRs pertaining to alleged forgery, cheating, and criminal breach of trust in relation to BDA transactions.
Catchwords: quashing of FIR · inherent powers · Section 482 CrPC · Section 528 BNSS · criminal breach of trust · cheating · forgery · Bangalore Development Authority · IPC Sections 409 420 465 468 471 472 120B 34 · batch matters · CCB investigation

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 13, Cited by 0] Karnataka High Court Krishnoji Rao @ Rao vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 April, 2025 Author: Mohammad Nawaz Bench: Mohammad Nawaz -1- NC: 2025:KHC:16538 CRL.P No. 11791 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 3598 of 2022 CRL.P No. 3609 of 2022 AND 18 OTHERS IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11791 OF 2024 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3598 OF 2022, CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3609 OF 2022 CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3717 OF 2022 CRIMINAL
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All Karnataka HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find a verified advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Connect with a verified advocate on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →