LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/mrmr-mukesh-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-20260206/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal

Mrmr Mukesh Singh vs The State Of Karnataka

Court
Karnataka High Court
Date
6 February 2026
Case No.
Criminal Referred Case No.2/2024 C/W Criminal Appeal No.2216/2024 and Criminal Appeal No.2246/2024
Bench
H.P. Sandesh J. and Venkatesh Naik T J.
Acts & Sections
IPC §120B IPC §302 IPC §366A IPC §376DB IPC §377 IPC §201
Also reported in
This judgment disposed of connected matters. The same reasons were delivered in the following 2 cases.
Addl District And Sessions Judge - ... vs Jayban Adivasi @ Jay Singh
Criminal Referred Case No.2/2024 C/W Criminal Appeal No.2216/2024 and Criminal Appeal No.2246/2024
Mr. Jayban Adivasi @ Jay Singh vs The State Of Karnataka
Criminal Referred Case No.2/2024 C/W Criminal Appeal No.2216/2024 and Criminal Appeal No.2246/2024
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
The Karnataka High Court dealt with a Criminal Reference under Section 366(1) Cr.P.C. for confirmation of death sentence and connected criminal appeals filed by accused persons challenging conviction and sentence imposed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-II (POCSO), Mangaluru in Special Case No.10/2022. The trial court convicted accused Nos.1 to 3 — Jayban Adivasi @ Jay Singh, Mukesh Singh, and Manish Thirki — for offences of criminal conspiracy, procurement of minor girl, unnatural offence, murder, and causing disappearance of evidence, as well as aggravated penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act, and sentenced them to death by hanging.

The offences arose out of a conspiracy amongst the accused, who committed gang rape, unnatural offence, and murder of a minor victim at Mangaluru. The trial court found that all three accused acted in concert under Section 34 IPC and imposed the extreme penalty of death under Sections 302, 376DB, and 120B IPC read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act, along with rigorous imprisonment for lesser offences under Sections 366A, 377, and 201 IPC.

The High Court heard arguments from the Additional SPP for the State, counsel for the respective accused, and an Amicus Curiae appointed for the victim/informant, and reserved the matter for judgment. The court's CAV order was pronounced on 6 February 2026 addressing both the reference for confirmation of death sentence and the appeals filed by the convicted accused seeking acquittal.
Catchwords: death penalty · confirmation of death sentence · gang rape of minor · POCSO Act · aggravated penetrative sexual assault · murder · criminal conspiracy · unnatural offence · procurement of minor girl · disappearance of evidence · Section 366 CrPC reference · joint liability

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 25, Cited by 0] Karnataka High Court Mrmr Mukesh Singh vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2026 Author: H.P.Sandesh Bench: H.P.Sandesh 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 R PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CRIMINAL REFERRED CASE NO.2/2024 C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2216/2024 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2246/2024 IN CRIMINAL REFERRED CASE NO.2/2024: BETWEEN: 1. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560 001. ... COMPLAINANT (BY SMT. RASHMI J
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All Karnataka HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find a verified advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Connect with a verified advocate on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →