LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/mr-m-k-sanjay-kumar-vs-the-state-through-20250421/ · Printed 10 Nov 2026
Criminal

Mr. M K Sanjay Kumar vs The State - Through

Court
Karnataka High Court
Date
21 April 2025
Case No.
CRL.P No. 11791 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 3598 of 2022, CRL.P No. 3609 of 2022 and 18 Others
Bench
Mohammad Nawaz J
Acts & Sections
CrPC §482 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 §528 IPC §409 IPC §420 IPC §465 IPC §468
Also reported in
This judgment disposed of connected matters. The same reasons were delivered in the following 3 cases.
Krishnoji Rao vs The State Of Karnataka
CRL.P No. 11791 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 3598 of 2022, CRL.P No. 3609 of 2022 and 18 Others
Mr. M. K. Sanjay Kumar vs The State - Through The
CRL.P No. 11791 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 3598 of 2022, CRL.P No. 3609 of 2022 and 18 Others
Krishnoji Rao @ Rao vs The State Of Karnataka
CRL.P No. 11791 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 3598 of 2022, CRL.P No. 3609 of 2022 and 18 Others
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
A batch of criminal petitions was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) before the High Court of Karnataka seeking quashing of FIRs registered at Sheshadripuram Police Station, Bengaluru, in Crime Nos. 15/2022, 16/2022, 17/2022, 18/2022 and connected cases, for alleged offences punishable under Sections 409, 420, 465, 468, 471, 472, and 120B read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners, who include officers and officials connected with the Bangalore Development Authority, challenged the registration and continuation of criminal proceedings arising out of alleged fraud and forgery in relation to BDA matters.

The petitions were heard together as they arose from a common set of facts and FIRs registered by the Sheshadripuram Police Station and subsequently transferred to the Central Crime Branch (CCB), Bengaluru, with the cases pending on the file of the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru. The petitioners contended that the FIRs were liable to be quashed as the allegations did not disclose commission of cognizable offences warranting prosecution.

The High Court, after considering the arguments of the petitioners and the State, disposed of the batch of criminal petitions by its order dated 21 April 2025, the detailed reasoning and operative directions being contained in the judgment authored by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Nawaz.
Catchwords: quashing of FIR · Section 482 CrPC · Section 528 BNSS · criminal breach of trust · cheating · forgery · Bangalore Development Authority · BDA · fraud · FIR quashing · IPC offences · CCB investigation · cognizable offence

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Filed under

Quashing of FIR (Section 482 CrPC / 528 BNSS) Forged documents

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 13, Cited by 0] Karnataka High Court Mr. M K Sanjay Kumar vs The State - Through on 21 April, 2025 Author: Mohammad Nawaz Bench: Mohammad Nawaz -1- NC: 2025:KHC:16538 CRL.P No. 11791 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 3598 of 2022 CRL.P No. 3609 of 2022 AND 18 OTHERS IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11791 OF 2024 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3598 OF 2022, CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3609 OF 2022 CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3717 OF 2022 CRIMINAL PE
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All Karnataka HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find an advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Find an advocate who handles this kind of matter on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →