LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/krishnoji-rao-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-20250421-2/ · Printed 21 Oct 2026
Criminal

Krishnoji Rao vs The State Of Karnataka

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
21 April 2025
Case No.
CRL.P No. 11791 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 3598 of 2022, CRL.P No. 3609 of 2022 and 18 Others
Bench
Mohammad Nawaz J.
Acts & Sections
CrPC §482 Bharatiya Nagarik Su §528 IPC §409 IPC §420 IPC §465 IPC §468
Headnote AI-drafted · Editorially reviewed
These were a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (now Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) seeking quashing of FIRs registered at Sheshadripuram Police Station, Bengaluru, in various Crime Numbers of 2022, for alleged offences punishable under Sections 409, 420, 465, 468, 471, 472, and 120B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIRs were initially registered by the Sheshadripuram Police Station and subsequently transferred to the Central Crime Branch (CCB), Bengaluru, and were pending on the file of the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru.

The petitioners, including officers and individuals connected with the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA), challenged the criminal proceedings arising out of alleged offences of criminal breach of trust, cheating, forgery, using forged documents, and counterfeiting. The matters were clubbed together before the Karnataka High Court given the commonality of the FIRs, the parties involved, and the nature of the allegations emanating from the functioning of the BDA.

The Karnataka High Court, presided over by Justice Mohammad Nawaz, took up all the connected petitions together and proceeded to examine the legality and propriety of the FIRs and the criminal proceedings challenged therein.
Catchwords: quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Section 528 BNSS criminal breach of trust cheating forgery using forged documents counterfeiting Bangalore Development Authority BDA Central Crime Branch IPC Section 409 IPC Section 420 IPC Section 465 IPC Section 468 IPC Section 471 IPC Section 472 IPC Section 120B IPC Section 34

© LegalFirms.in — Headnote is proprietary. Raw judgment text is in the public domain per Section 52(1)(p) of the Copyright Act, 1957.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 13, Cited by 0] Karnataka High Court Krishnoji Rao vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 April, 2025 Author: Mohammad Nawaz Bench: Mohammad Nawaz -1- NC: 2025:KHC:16538 CRL.P No. 11791 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 3598 of 2022 CRL.P No. 3609 of 2022 AND 18 OTHERS IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11791 OF 2024 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3598 OF 2022, CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3609 OF 2022 CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3717 OF 2022 CRIMINAL PETITI
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
From ₹167/month.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

More SC — Criminal