Arbitration Act, 1940 – ss.17, 14(2) – Award to be signed and filed – Judgment in terms of award – Limitation Act, 1963 – Article 119(b) of the First Schedule – 30 days period for filing objections to the award – Start of limitation, when – Appellant filed application u/s.17 on 10.11.2022 for pronouncement of the judgment in terms of the award – Dismissed by Trial Court holding that the application was premature as it was filed before the expiry of the 30 days period for filing objections to the award, reckoned from 18.11.2022, when formal notice of the Award was said to have been received by the respondent – Order upheld by High Court – Correctness:
Held: The date of receiving a copy of the award is not the requirement of Section 14(2), but merely awareness that it is available to the parties – Respondent had notice of filing of the award due to the order dated 21.09.2022, wherein the District Court directed the respondents to hand over the balance fee to the arbitrators, following which the award shall be furnished – Thus, respondent was fully aware of the making of the Award by 21.09.2022, for the law does not require a formal notice of the making of the Award, as against knowledge/notice of the Award – District Court and the High Court erred in holding that the limitation for filing objections was still running when the appellant filed the application under Section 17 on 10.11.2022 – The formal date of notice of filing of the award on the respondents, that is, 18.11.2022 holds no significance as they were made sufficiently aware of the award’s filing on 21.09.2022 itself – The court directing the respondents to clear the fees was a clear intimation about its filing – Limitation expired on 20.10.2022 – Thus, appellant’s application seeking pronouncement of judgment in terms of the award was valid and well beyond the period for filing objections to the award – Impugned order set aside. [Paras 18, 14, 2, 19, 20] Words and Phrases – ‘notice’; ‘service of notice’ – Arbitration Act, 1940 – ss.14, 17 – Award to be signed and filed – Judgment in terms of award – Limitation Act, 1963 – Article 119(b) of the First Schedule – 30 days period for filing objections to the award – Limitation to start running from when:
Held: The limitation for filing objections to the award is 30 days, and is governed by Article 119(b) of the First Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963 – The trigger for the limitation to start running specified therein is the date of service of notice of the filing of the award – Further, Section 14(2) requires that the court of relevant jurisdiction should give notice to the concerned parties when an award is filed – From a plain reading of the provisions, it appears that the parties need to be notified of the filing of award – While Art.119(b) of the Limitation Act requires that there be a ‘service of notice’ for the limitation to start running, Section 14(2) merely states that court ‘give notice’ to the parties – The precise form of what constitutes as a ‘notice’ of filing the award is unspecified – However, interpreted reasonably, what must be required is that the parties come to know about the existence of the award so that any objections to it may be filed – What appears from the usage of the word ‘notice’ is that the parties merely reach a state of awareness about the award and plan their next steps accordingly, and not the imposition of another procedural step. [Paras 14, 15]
As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Divya Pandey. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.