LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/jyoti-limited-vs-bse-limited-anr-20241210/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Jyoti Limited vs BSE Limited & Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
10 December 2024
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 4707 of 2022
Result
Dismissed
Bench
Pankaj Mithal, Sandeep Mehta
Citation
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 1117 : 2024 INSC 992
Acts & Sections
Securitisation and Reconstruction of… Companies Act, 2013 SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure… Contract Act
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1117 : 2024 INSC 992
Issue for consideration
Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) rejected the application of the appellant for the listing of certain equity shares to the BSE holding that the appellant had not taken in principle approval from the Stock Exchange and it also did not take the approval of the shareholders for the allotment of the shares to the Asset Reconstruction Private Limited (RARE). Order upheld and confirmed by the Securities Appellate Tribunal.
Headnote

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Act, 2002 – s.9(1) – Companies Act, 2013 – s.62(1)(c) – SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 – Regulation 28: Held: s.9, SARFAESI Act authorizes RARE to convert portion of the debt into shares of the borrower company but such authority is subject to s.62, Companies Act, 2013 which in turn requires a resolution of the shareholders of the company – However, when such a proposal is not by the appellant company, the approval of the shareholders may not be necessary – On facts, the proposal for increasing the subscribed capital of the company by converting part of the debt into equity shares was initiated by the appellant company itself and not actually by RARE – Therefore, the proposal was that of the company only – Accordingly, as contemplated by s.62(1)(c), Companies Act, 2013, the approval of the shareholders would be mandatory before the shares are accepted for listing on the BSE – Furthermore, the approval of the BSE is necessary in view of Regulation 28 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 – No error or illegality committed either by the BSE or the Securities Appellate Tribunal – Statutory appeal u/s.22 F, Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 is devoid of merit. [Paras 5, 7-9]

Keywords: Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) · Securities Appellate Tribunal · Listing of equity shares · In principle approval from the Stock Exchange · Approval of the shareholders for the allotment of the shares to the Asset Reconstruction Private Limited (RARE) · SARFAESI Act · Convert debt into equity shares · Resolution of the Board of Directors · Approval of the shareholders mandatory · Subscribed capital · Resolution of the shareholders of the company · Special resolution

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Divya Pandey. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Order 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Under challenge in this statutory appeal is the judgment and order dated 21.12.2021 passed by the Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai in Appeal No. 224 of 2019 titled as “Jyoti Limited Vs. BSE Limited and Anr.”. 3. The appellant-Jyoti Limited applied for listing of certain equity shares to the Bombay Stock Exchange1 but the application to that effect was not accepted for the reason that the appellant had not taken in principle approval from the Stock Exchange and that the appellant had not even taken the approval of the shareholders for t
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →