LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/jyoti-builders-vs-chief-executive-officer-ors-20251202/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Jyoti Builders vs Chief Executive Officer & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
2 December 2025
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 14512 of 2025
Result
Disposed
Bench
J.B. Pardiwala, K.V. Viswanathan
Citation
[2025] 12 S.C.R. 317 : 2025 INSC 1372
Acts & Sections
Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement… Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 Development Control Regulations, 1991
Supreme Court Reports [2025] 12 S.C.R. 317 : 2025 INSC 1372
Issue for consideration
Whether a mandamus should be issued to the State Government to acquire the subject property in accordance with s.14(1) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 keeping in mind the order dated 26.02.2015 (2015 order) passed by the Chief Executive Officer-Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA); whether the appellant is entitled to full Occupation Certificate for the final sale building in the slum scheme upon handing over the portion of land admeasuring 2700 sq. mts. meant for Recreational Ground (RG) identified as the dark green portion; whether the appellant has been fully compensated by granting an equivalent and/or adequate area (FSI) for sale by the State Government.
Headnote

Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 – s.14 r/w s.3D(c)(i) – Under the Development Plan of 1991 for Mumbai, the Subject Property was reserved for Recreational Ground (RG) – In 2015, an order was passed by respondent No.1-SRA after giving notice to and hearing to all the concerned including the respondent No.5 (the then owner) inter alia holding that the Slum Scheme of the appellant-builder had substantially been implemented on the entire area covering the Project Property (including the Subject Property) and the Subject Property was liable to be acquired in the interest of the slum scheme and the slum dwellers on the Subject Property had to be rehabilitated by the appellant – Respondent No.5 transferred her title rights in the subject property in favour of the respondent No.4 who floated its own proposal for implementation of the slum rehabilitation scheme – Writ petition filed by the appellant questioning the orders passed by the SRA granting sanction to the respondent No.4 and refusal to implement the 2015 Order and; seeking a mandamus for the acquisition of the subject property relying on the SRA’s 2015 order – Dismissed by High Court – Challenge to: Held: Power of the State Government u/s.14 r/w s.3D(c)(i), Slum Act is subject to preferential right, if any, of the owner – It is undisputed that when the respondent No.4 submitted its proposal for development of the subject property in 2022, the same was accepted in accordance with law as there was no slum scheme proposal on the subject property – On facts, no case made out by the appellant for a writ of mandamus to be issued to the State Government to acquire the subject property u/s.14, Slum Act – Appellant is entitled to the Occupation Certificate for the Final Sale Building in the slum scheme on the appellant handing over the Dark Green Portion admeasuring 2700 sq. mts. reserved for RG – Further, the appellant has been fully compensated by granting adequate area/FSI for sale – Respondent No. 4, their successors and assigns shall not put up any type of construction on the subject property and the same shall be utilized only as a RG. [Paras 67, 77]

Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 – Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 – Development Control Regulations, 1991 – Scheme of the Slum Act, 1971. [Paras 60-62]

Keywords: Section 14, Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 · No mandamus can be issued to State Government to acquire property under Section 14, Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 · Recreational Ground · Slum rehabilitation scheme · Slum redevelopment scheme · Owner possesses a preferential right to redevelop the Slum Rehabilitation Area · Preferential right to redevelop · Redevelopment of slum dwellers · Mandamus to State Government to acquire property

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Divya Pandey. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment J.B. Pardiwala, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises from the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Original Ordinary Civil Jurisdiction) dated 18.12.2024 by which the writ petition filed by the appellant herein seeking to challenge the orders passed by the respondent No. 1 herein dated 03.10.2022 and respondent No. 3 herein dated 07.10.2024 respectively came to be dismissed. 3. Over and above the challenge to the two orders referred to above, the appellant also prayed before the High Court for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent Nos. 1
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →