LegalFirms.in

Justice N Kotiswar Singh

71 Supreme Court judgments with Justice N Kotiswar Singh on the bench, 2024 to 2026, from the bench each Supreme Court Report prints. Being on the bench does not mean writing the opinion; each judgment page names the bench.

By year
2026 20 2025 37 2024 14
Most often on the same bench
Justice B.V. Nagarathna 21Justice Sanjay Karol 20Justice Surya Kant 19Justice M.M. Sundresh 3Justice K.V. Viswanathan 3Justice Abhay S. Oka 2Justice Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai 2Justice N. V. Anjaria 1
Acts most often in these headnotes
Indian Penal Code, 1860 15Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 10Constitution of India 9Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 4Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 3Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 3West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 2Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 2
Mahesh Damu Khare vs The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
SC · 26 November 2024
[2024] 11 S.C.R. 886 : 2024 INSC 897
The High Court dismissed the petition filed u/s.482 of CrPC for quashing FIR registered u/ss.376, 420, 504 and 506 IPC holding, inter alia, that the offence under Section 376 of IPC is an offence against the society whic…
Gurmeet Kaur vs Devender Gupta & Another
SC · 26 November 2024
[2024] 11 S.C.R. 1602 : 2024 INSC 967
Issue arose whether the appellant while discharging her duty as a public servant on the relevant date, there was any excess in the discharge of the said duty which did not require the first respondent to take a prior san…
Naeem Bano Alias Gaindo vs Mohammad Rahees & Anr.
SC · 22 November 2024
[2024] 11 S.C.R. 1492 : 2024 INSC 1000
Inconsistency between the U.P. State amendment and the subsequent Parliamentary amendment to Section 106, Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Whether in view of the Parliament amending a provision subsequent to a State legis…
Prashant vs State of NCT of Delhi
SC · 20 November 2024
[2024] 11 S.C.R. 825 : 2024 INSC 879
Whether FIR u/ss.376(2)(n) and s.506 IPC lodged against the appellant should be quashed; whether allegations in the FIR are correct; whether relationship between the parties was consensual in nature.
M/s Bharti Airtel Ltd. vs The Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune
SC · 20 November 2024
[2024] 11 S.C.R. 1525 : 2024 INSC 880
Whether the mobile service providers who pay excise duties on various items for setting up their business more particularly for erection of mobile towers and peripherals like pre-fabricated buildings etc. can take the be…
State of Madhya Pradesh vs Ramji Lal Sharma & Another
SC · 23 September 2024
[2024] 10 S.C.R. 411 : 2024 INSC 747
Matter pertains to the application filed by applicant seeking his release from further jail sentence, on the ground of his juvenility on the date of the offence and has already undergone a sentence of more than four year…
Kukreja Construction Company & Others vs State of Maharashtra & Others
SC · 13 September 2024
[2024] 9 S.C.R. 830 : 2024 INSC 692
Whether the High Court was right in declining to grant relief to the writ petitioners-appellants herein on the ground of delay and laches; whether the appeals filed by the respondent-Mumbai Municipal Corporation would ca…
S. Vijikumari vs Mowneshwarachari C
SC · 10 September 2024
[2024] 10 S.C.R. 45 : 2024 INSC 732
Respondent sought refund of the entire maintenance amount which was paid to the appellant (wife of respondent).
Ravi Agrawal vs Union of India & Another
SC · 20 August 2024
[2024] 8 S.C.R. 788 : 2024 INSC 648
Matter pertains to the issue that if the amendment to s.80DD of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be given retrospective effect.
Mahendra Kumar Sonker vs The State of Madhya Pradesh
SC · 12 August 2024
[2024] 8 S.C.R. 935 : 2024 INSC 600
Whether the conviction of the appellant under s.353 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) can be sustained without proving assault and use of criminal force.
K. Arumugam vs Union of India & Others Etc.
SC · 8 August 2024
[2024] 8 S.C.R. 830 : 2024 INSC 630
Appellant-assessees purchased Kerala State Lotteries from the District Lottery Offices and other States’ lotteries in bulk from registered promoters at a discounted rate. The appellant subsequently sold them to retailers…

All judges · Judgments by Act · Topics