LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/hitesh-nagjibhai-patel-vs-bababhai-nagjibhai-rabari-anr-20250808/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Hitesh Nagjibhai Patel vs Bababhai Nagjibhai Rabari & Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
8 August 2025
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 10278 of 2025
Result
Allowed
Bench
Sanjay Karol, Prashant Kumar Mishra
Citation
[2025] 8 S.C.R. 2428 : 2025 INSC 1070
Acts & Sections
Motor Vehicle Act, 1988
Supreme Court Reports [2025] 8 S.C.R. 2428 : 2025 INSC 1070
Issue for consideration
Issue arose whether the courts below failed to award compensation under the head loss of earnings to the minor appellant; and whether the High Court erred in granting an adequate amount of compensation under pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages.
Headnote

Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 – Compensation – Enhancement – Appellant-minor aged 8 years suffered permanent disability in a road accident – Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs. 3.90 lakh – High Court enhanced it to Rs. 8.65 lakhs – Interference: Held: Minor child who suffers death or permanent disability in a motor vehicle accident, cannot be placed in the same category as a non-earning individual for assessing the amount of compensation – In such a case, the computation of compensation under the head of loss of income ought to be made by adopting, the minimum wages payable to a skilled workman as notified for the relevant period in the respective State where the cause of action arises – Prevailing minimum wages, for the skilled ones, in the year of accident-2012, in Gujarat would be Rs.227.85p. per day, thus, the income of the appellant is determined as Rs.6,836 per month, rounding off – As regards the assessment of disability suffered by the appellant, taking into account the direct correlation between the injuries sustained and the consequent loss of permanent functional disability suffered by the appellant, the finding of the High Court that the permanent functional disability stands rightly fixed at 90% – To award just and fair compensation, the compensation towards other pecuniary heads enhanced in accordance with the settled principle of law – On basis thereof, compensation enhanced to Rs.35,90,489/-, with interest @ 9% pa on the amount to be paid, from the date of filing of the claim petition – Impugned award passed by the High Court stands modified – Since the law had been amply clarified well before the order of the tribunal was made, by this Court in Kajal’s case, the appeals to the High Court as well as to this Court were entirely avoidable – Both the Courts duty-bound to keep abreast with the law as clarified by this Court, ensuring that the judgments and orders passed by them are entirely in order therewith – Furthermore, Insurance company/contesting party to furnish before the tribunal the schedule of minimum wages payable to a skilled worker, in cases where the income of the claimant/deceased not been properly established – Precedent. [Paras 9-18]

Keywords: Compensation · Loss of earnings · Adequate amount of compensation · Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages · Permanent disability · Monthly income · Quantum of compensation · Death or permanent disability · Motor vehicle accident · Minimum wages · Skilled workman · Cause of action · Grievous and life-altering injuries · Brain haemorrhage · Amputation of the lower limb · Disability certificate · Permanent functional disability · Just and fair compensation · Pecuniary heads · Insurance company

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Order Time taken for disposal of the claim petition by MACT 8 years 3 months Time taken for disposal of the appeal by the High Court 2 years 6 months Time taken for disposal of the appeal in this Court 5 months 6 days Leave granted. 2. By way of the present appeal, the claimant-appellant challenges the Judgment and Order of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad passed on 20th August 2024, in R/First Appeal No.4863 of 2022, which, in turn, was preferred against the order dated 17th September 2021 in M.A.C.P. No.87 of 2017 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi) & 3r
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →