Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Whether the appellant, as a family member of a land-loser, whose land was acquired for the Kaiga Atomic Power Project, had legally secured the job as the son in-law, of the land-loser:
Held: Appellant claims to have married the daughter of the land loser, thus was appointed as a helper in the Project, as a family member of the land loser – Later, matrimonial differences arose and divorce was granted on account of the estrangement between the appellant and his wife, the father in law (land loser) made complaints against the appointment of appellant in the Project – The resultant inquiry was answered against appellant and the said decision led to the termination of the appellant – The said termination was challenged eventually before the Labour Court – The Labour Court after assessing that the divorce proceeding was initiated for maintenance by appellant’s wife – The Labour Court held that this itself would be enough to establish that the appellant had married Smt. Ganga (daughter of land loser) – The Labour Court concluded that termination of appellant was illegal, he should be reinstated with full back wages – This award was challenged before High Court – The High Court while concluding, overlooked the family details recorded by the employer which indicates Smt. Ganga as the wife of the employee also the Ration Card has the same family details of the appellant – The Court also failed to appreciate that the learned Labour Court reached the factual conclusion, after due consideration of the material evidence – Therefore this Court held that the Award in favour of the appellant, granted by the Labour Court, was erroneously disturbed by the learned Single Judge, thus impugned judgment is set aside – Reinstatment of appellant allowed but the appellant shall not be entitled to any back wages from the date of the order of the Single Judge of the High Court until his reinstatement – This Court is not in favor to wait for the decision in Bharat Fritz Werner Ltd., Bangalore v. Bharat Fritz Werner Karmika Sangha, Bangalore as the said case relates to maintainability of Writ Appeal challenging the order of the learned Single Judge arising out of an Award passed by the Labour Court. [Paras 11, 12, 13]
As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Gaurav Upadhyay, Hony. Associate Editor (Verified by: Shadan Farasat, Sr. Adv.). Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.