LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/ecgc-limited-vs-mokul-shriram-epc-jv-20220215/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Ecgc Limited vs Mokul Shriram Epc Jv

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
15 February 2022
Case No.
I.A. No. 99210 of 2021
Result
Allowed
Bench
Hemant Gupta, V. Ramasubramanian
Citation
[2022] 2 S.C.R. 155 : 2022 INSC 188
Supreme Court Reports [2022] 2 S.C.R. 155 : 2022 INSC 188
Headnote

Consumer Protection Act: Applicability of 1986 and 2019 Act – In the instant case, Complainant was awarded a contract by the Government of Iraq – Grievance of the complainant was that the payment for invoices issued for the work done under the contract was suspended – Thus, relief was sought before the National Commission by filing a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 which was allowed – In the instant appeal, the question for consideration is whether the appeal would be governed under the 1986 or 2019 Act – Held: s.67 of 2019 Act states that no appeal shall be entertained unless the person has deposited 50 percent of the amount required to be paid – Whereas under the 1986 Act, unless

50 percent of the amount or 50 thousand, whichever is less, is deposited, appeal is not entertained – Repeal of enactment does not affect any right acquired or accrued under the enactment so repealed or affect any legal proceeding in respect of such right – When lis commences, all rights get crystallized and no clog upon a likely appeal can be put unless the law make express or implied implication – Hence, onerous condition of 50 percent of the amount awarded shall not be applicable to complaints filed prior to the commencement of the 2019 Act – General Clauses Act, 1897 – s.6. Garikapati Veeraya v. N. Subbiah Choudhry & Ors. AIR 1957 SC 540 : [1957] SCR 488 – followed.

Hoosein Kasam Dada (India) Ltd. v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. AIR 1953 SC 221 : [1953] SCR 987 – relied on.

Nogendra Nath Bose v. Mon Mohan Singha Roy & Ors. AIR 1931 Cal. 100; State of Bombay v. M/s. Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd. & Anr. AIR 1960 SC 980 : [1960] SCR 640; Vitthalbhai Naranbhai Patel v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, M.P., Nagpur AIR 1967 SC 344; M/s. Hardeodas Jagannath v. The State of Assam & Ors. AIR 1970 SC 724 : [1969] SCR 261; K. Raveendranathan Nair & Anr. v. Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. (2017) 9 SCC 355 : [2017]

Read the full headnote (4 more paragraphs)

11 SCR 389; Anant Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Gujarat & Ors. (1975) 2 SCC 175 : [1975] 3 SCR 220; Gujarat Agro Industries Co. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of the City of Ahmedabad & Ors. (1999) 4 SCC 468 : [1999] 2 SCR 895; Ramesh Singh & Anr. v. Cinta Devi & Ors. (1996) 3 SCC 142 : [1996] 2 SCR 1036; M/s Gurcharan Singh Baldev Singh Yashwant Singh & Ors. (1992) 1 SCC 428 : [1991] 2 Suppl. SCR 305; Thirumalai Chemicals Limited v. Union of India & Ors. (2011) 6 SCC 739 : [2011] 4 SCR 838; Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. State of UP & Ors 2021 SCC On Line SC 1044; Tecnimont Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Punjab & Ors. 2019 SCC On Line SC 1228; Sri Satya Nand Jha v. Union of India & Ors. 2016 SCC OnLine Jhar 23 M/s. Indian Oil Corporation v. Orissa Sales Tax Tribunal, CTC & Ors. 2009 SCC OnLine Ori 353; Manohar Infrastructure and Constructions Private Limited v. Sanjeev Kumar Sharma & Ors. Civil Appeal No. 7098 of 2021 with Ors. decided on 7.12.2021; Neena Aneja & Anr. v. Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. 2021 SCC OnLine SC 225; New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Shanti Misra (1975) 2 SCC

840 [1976] 2 SCR 266; Videocon International Limited v. Securities and Exchange Board of India (2015) 4 SCC 33 : [2015] 3 SCR 1; Maria Cristina De Souza Sodder & Ors. v. Amria Zurana Pereira Pinto & Ors. (1979) 1 SCC 92; Harihar Polyfibres v. Regional Director, ESI Corporation (1984) 4 SCC 324 : [1985]

1 SCR 712; Spring Meadows Hospital & Anr. v. Harjol Ahluwalia & Anr. (1998) 4 SCC 39 : [1998] 2 SCR 428; Kishore Lal v. Chairman, Employees’ State Insurance Corpn. (2007) 4 SCC 579 : [2007]

6 SCR 139; K.H. Nazar v. Mathew K. Jacob & Ors. (2020) 14 SCC 126 : [2019] 14 SCR 928; 29 M/s. Dream Castle & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. W.P. No. 13431 of 2015 etc. decided on 18.4.2016 – referred to.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Order of the Court was passed by HEMANT GUPTA, J. 1. The present appeal is directed against an order passed by the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission 1 whereby the appellant herein was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 265.01 Crores along with interest @ 10% p.a. from 19.9.2016 within a period of three months. In case of failure to deposit the said amount, the awarded amount would carry compensation in the form of simple interest @ 12% p.a. The appellant has filed an application (IA No. 99210 of 2021) ex abundanti cautela to entertain the appeal as per the provisions of the Consum
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →