LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/dr-mrs-suman-v-jain-vs-marwadi-sammelan-through-its-secretary-and-others-20240220/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Dr. Mrs. Suman V. Jain vs Marwadi Sammelan through its Secretary and Others

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
20 February 2024
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 1480 of 2012
Result
Allowed
Bench
J.K. Maheshwari, K.V. Viswanathan
Citation
[2024] 2 S.C.R. 617 : 2024 INSC 127
Acts & Sections
Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 2 S.C.R. 617 : 2024 INSC 127
Issue for consideration
Whether in the facts of the case, withdrawal of resignation dated 25.03.2003 submitted by the appellant prior to the effective date, i.e., 24.09.2003 ought to have been permitted; whether the letter of the Management dated 08.04.2003 accepting the resignation was final, binding and irrevocable and the rejection of the request for withdrawal of such resignation was in accordance with law and; in the facts of the case, what relief could be granted to the Appellant.
Headnote

Service Law – Withdrawal of prospective resignation prior to the effective date – Permissibility:

Held: In the absence of anything contrary in the provisions governing the terms and conditions of the office or post and in the absence of any legal contractual or constitutional bar, a prospective resignation can be withdrawn at any time before it becomes effective – Prospective or intending resignation would be complete and operative on arrival of the indicated future date in the absence of anything contrary in the terms and conditions of the employment/contract – The intimation sent in writing to the Competent Authority by the incumbent employee of his intention or proposal to resign from his office/post from a future specified date can be withdrawn at any time before it becomes effective – Letter dtd. 25.03.2003 was an intimation of resignation from a prospective date 24.09.2003, which could have been withdrawn by the appellant prior to the effective date – There was no Rule/Regulation which restrained such withdrawal – There was no prior consent to the letter dtd. 08.04.2003 for accepting resignation w.e.f. 24.09.2003 as ‘final, binding and irrevocable’ and therefore, by using such words, the acceptance of resignation was unilateral – Withdrawal of such resignation by appellant prior to the effective date was permissible – Thus, the judgment of the House of Lords in “The Rev. Oswald Joseph Reichel Vs. The Right Rev. John Fielder” does not apply to the facts of the present case and the dismissal of the petition of appellant on similarity of facts with the said case was not correct and such findings by three fora are unsustainable – On facts, the ratio of the judgment of the Constitution Bench in Union of India and Others v. Gopal Chand Misra and Others [1978] 3 SCR applies in full force – Orders passed by the College Tribunal and the High Court set aside – Further, on peculiar facts of this case, respondent no.1 to regularize the service period of the appellant from 24.09.2003 (when they wrongly treated the appellant as having resigned) till the date of joining the duty at the new Institution as Principal on 01.10.2007 – Directions issued. [Paras 28, 12, 27, 21, 31 and 29]

Doctrines/Principles – Principle of “vinculum juris” – Discussed. [Para 24]

Keywords: Prospective resignation · Withdrawal of prospective resignation · Effective date · Intending resignation · Prior to the effective date · Intention or proposal to resign · Intimation of resignation · Acceptance of resignation · Principle of “vinculum juris”

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment J.K. Maheshwari J. 1. The instant appeal arises out of the judgment dated 04.07.2008, passed by the Division Bench of the ‘High Court of Judicature at Bombay’ in Appeal No. 63 of 2008, whereby the Division Bench dismissed the appeal preferred by the appellant and confirmed the order dated 08.08.2006 passed by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 1611 of 2004. The said writ petition was filed by the appellant being aggrieved by an order dated 30.04.2004 passed by the ‘Mumbai University and College Tribunal, Mumbai’ (hereinafter referred to as “College Tribunal”) in ‘Civil Appeal
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →