LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/dharmendra-kumar-singh-ors-vs-the-hon-ble-high-court-of-jharkhand-ors-20250115/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Dharmendra Kumar Singh & Ors. vs The Hon’ble High Court of Jharkhand & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
15 January 2025
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 299 of 2025
Result
Allowed
Bench
B.V. Nagarathna, Satish Chandra Sharma
Citation
[2025] 1 S.C.R. 490 : 2025 INSC 72
Acts & Sections
Jharkhand Superior Judicial Services…
Supreme Court Reports [2025] 1 S.C.R. 490 : 2025 INSC 72
Issue for consideration
Issue arose as regards the promotion of the Civil Judges (Senior Division) to Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service.
Headnote

Judiciary – Superior judiciary – Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service – Promotion/appointment – Notification for appointment in the Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service – Quota for promotion based upon merit-cum-seniority and passing of suitability test is 65% – Appellants-promotee in the cadre of Civil Judge (Senior Division) participated in the selection process, however not selected – Appellants obtained more than the cut off marks for determining suitability of the candidate, however, persons junior to them, who had secured more marks promoted by preparing merit list – Writ petition by appellants – Dismissed by the High Court on the ground that appellants scored lower than the last selected candidate – Correctness:

Held: Suitability of each candidate has to be tested on his own merit and a comparative assessment cannot be made and the promotion cannot be solely based upon merit list – Appellants successfully qualified the suitability test, they could not have been deprived of their legitimate right of promotion only on account of lower placement in the merit list – Appellants have been subsequently promoted – Appellants entitled for notional promotion from the same date the other officers from the select list prepared by the High Court have been appointed to the post of District Judge in terms of the Notification – Orders passed by the High Court set aside – Jharkhand Superior Judicial Services (Recruitment, Appointment and Condition of Service) Rules, 2001 – rr.4, 5. [Paras 4-6]

Keywords: Promotion · Civil Judges (Senior Division) · Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service · Superior judiciary · Notification for appointment · Quota for promotion based upon merit-cum-seniority · Suitability test · Cadre of Civil Judge (Senior Division) · Selection process · Last selected candidate · Comparative assessment · Legitimate right of promotion · Lower placement in merit list · Notional promotion · Post of District Judge · Merit list · Select list · Limited Competitive Examination

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Order Satish Chandra Sharma, J. 1. The present appeal is arising out of judgment dated 29.06.2022 passed by High Court of Jharkhand in Writ Petition (C) No. 3771/2019, by which the High Court has declined to entertain the relief for quashment of notification dated 30.05.2019 whereby the private respondents have been appointed to the post of District Judge in the Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service on promotion in the State of Jharkhand. 2. The facts of the case reveal that appellant No. 1 was initially appointed as Munsif [Civil Judge (Junior Division)] and was promoted on 23.07.2014 in the
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →