LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/cdr-seema-chaudhary-vs-union-of-india-and-others-20240226/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

CDR Seema Chaudhary vs Union of India and Others

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
26 February 2024
Case No.
Review Petition (Civil) No. 1036 of 2023
Result
Disposed
Bench
D.Y. Chandrachud, Hima Kohli
Citation
[2024] 2 S.C.R. 820 : 2024 INSC 147
Acts & Sections
Constitution
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 2 S.C.R. 820 : 2024 INSC 147
Issue for consideration
Issues pertains to the grant of Permanent Commission to Women Short Service Commission Officers in the Indian Navy.
Headnote

Armed Forces – Indian Navy – Women Short Service Commissioned Officers – Grant of permanent commission – Petitioner commissioned in the Indian Navy as a Short Service Commissioned Officer in the Judge Advocate Generals’ Branch of the Indian Navy – Petitioner was considered for permanent commission but denied on the ground that there were no vacancies – Petitioner moved this Court u/Art. 32 of the Constitution, but was relegated to the Armed Forces Tribunal – Directions of the tribunal formed the subject matter of challenge before this Court in Civil Appeal which was disposed of – Hence, the instant review petition:

Held: Serious element of prejudice caused to the petitioner must be rectified so as to enforce the final directions of this Court in *Lieutenant Commander Annie Nagaraja’s case – Issuance of directions to consider the case of the petitioner for the grant of Permanent Commission afresh by reconvening a Selection Board – Selection Board to consider the petitioner’s case on a stand alone basis uninfluenced by any previous consideration of her case for PC and by any observations contained in the order of the AFT – It is clarified that in the event that pursuant to the directions of the AFT, if a proportional increase in the vacancies is required to be created to accommodate the petitioner, this would be carried out without creating any precedent for the future – Exercise of considering the petitioner afresh for PC to be carried out on or before the stipulated date. [Paras 16-18,19,20]

Keywords: Permanent Commission · Short Service Commission Officers · Indian Navy · Judge Advocate Generals’ Branch · Vacancies · Armed Forces Tribunal · Review petition · Binding judgment · Selection Board · Proportional increase in the vacancies

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI 1. A batch of petitions pertaining to the grant of Permanent Commission1 to Short Service Commission2 Officers in the Indian Navy was disposed of by this Court by its judgment in Union of India vs Lieutenant Commander Annie Nagaraja3. The review petitioner was one of the officers before this Court. The submissions which were urged on her behalf were set out in paragraph 52 of the judgment. 2. In order to appreciate the grievance in the review petition, a reference to some of the salient facts would be in order. The petitioner was commissioned in the
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →