Case Details Vashist Narayan Kumar vs The State of Bihar & Ors.

Court

Supreme Court of India

Date

2 January 2024

Case No.

Civil Appeal No. 1 of 2024

Result

Allowed

Bench

J.K. Maheshwari, K.V. Viswanathan

Citation

[2024] 1 S.C.R. 1 : 2024 INSC 2

Acts & Sections

Constitution

Issue for consideration

Whether an error committed in the application form, which was uploaded is a material error or a trivial error and was the State justified in declaring the appellant as having failed on account of the same.

Headnote

Service Law – Recruitment – Inadvertent error in application form – Final result reflected failed – Appellant applied for the post of Police Constable – He cleared the written exam and the Physical Eligibility Test – However, the final result reflected him as failed – The only reason was that the application form uploaded online, appellant’s date of birth was shown as 08.12.1997, in the school mark sheet, his date of birth was reflected as 18.12.1997 – Propriety:

Held: The appellant’s application uploaded from the cyber café did mention the date of birth as 08.12.1997, while his date of birth as recorded in the educational certificate was 18.12.1997 – It is also undisputed that it is the appellant who produced the educational certificates – He was oblivious of the error that had crept into his application form – On the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, it cannot be said that the error was so grave as to constitute wrong or mis-leading information – There is an exception for trivial errors or omissions as law does concern itself with trifles – This principle is recognized in the legal maxim-De minimis non curat lex – Also, admittedly the appellant derived no advantage as even if either of the dates were taken, he was eligible; the error also had no bearing on the selection process – Considering the background in which the error occurred, the cancellation is set aside and the respondent-State is directed to treat the appellant as a candidate who has ‘passed’ in the selection process. [Paras 11,12,15, 25, 26] List of Citations and Other References

Yogesh Kumar and Others vs. Govt. of NCT, Delhi and Others, [2003] 2 SCR 662 : (2003) 3 SCC 548 – distinguished.

Divya vs. Union of India & Ors., 2023 INSC 900 : 2023

(13) SCALE 730; Prince Jaibir Singh vs. Union of India & Ors., C.A. No. 6983 of 2021 decided by the Supreme Court – referred to.

Rohit Kumar and Another vs. Union of India and Others, 2022 SCC OnLine Del 1219; Pradeep Kumar vs. Union of India and Others, 2022 SCC OnLine Del

239 – distinguished.

Case Details Vashist Narayan Kumar v. The State of Bihar & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 1 of 2024) 02 January 2024 [J.K. Maheshwari and K.V. Viswanathan*, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Whether an error committed in the application form, which was uploaded is a material error or a trivial error and was the State justified in declaring the appellant as having failed on account of the same. Headnotes Service Law – Recruitment – Inadvertent error in application form – Final result reflected failed – Appellant applied for the post of Police Constable – He cleared the written exam and the Physica

View Subscription Plans →